Back Strain / Soft Tissue cases from motor vehicle accidents can vary significantly in severity and outcome. These cases involve injuries that may require medical treatment, rehabilitation, and can impact quality of life. Settlement values depend on injury severity, medical expenses, recovery time, and long-term effects on the victim's daily activities and ability to work.
Last updated: November 2025
One driver was traveling southbound when the other driver exited a private drive and struck the side of the first driver's vehicle. This collision caused the first driver's vehicle to then hit a third vehicle on the other side. The first driver suffered injuries to her neck and back.
One driver was stopped at an intersection waiting to turn left when their vehicle was hit from behind. The impact pushed their car into oncoming traffic, where it was hit a second time. The car then went off the road and struck a rockery and tree.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. This impact caused the first vehicle to then hit the vehicle in front of it. The driver who was hit first sustained injuries to their neck and back.
One driver made an unsafe lane change, causing the vehicle behind them to rear-end them. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the one in front. The driver who was rear-ended sustained serious injuries and sought compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering. The defendants argued the other driver was at fault or that third parties caused the damages. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.
One driver entered an intersection against a red light and struck another vehicle. The impact caused the plaintiffs' vehicle to hit a third vehicle. The plaintiffs reported neck and back pain and sought chiropractic and rehabilitative care for spinal injuries.
Two minor children were passengers in their parents' vehicle when it was struck by another car. The collision occurred after one vehicle exited a private drive and hit a second vehicle, causing that second vehicle to lose control and enter the oncoming lane. The children sustained minor injuries and emotional distress. The case was settled.
One driver was injured when their vehicle was struck by another vehicle. The striking vehicle was trying to avoid a third vehicle that had changed lanes improperly. The injured driver suffered various strains, sprains, and disc issues. The jury found one of the drivers at fault.
One driver was traveling east on a highway and was struck by another driver who was traveling south on a road with a stop sign. The first driver had been following a tractor-trailer that crossed the intersection and then stopped. The second driver stopped in the middle of the intersection behind the stopped truck, and the first driver collided with the second driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to her neck, back, shoulder, chest, and knee.
One driver was driving in Houston when another driver ran a red light and struck a turning vehicle. The second driver's vehicle then collided head-on with the first driver's car. The first driver claimed injuries to her neck, back, and wrists.
One driver was stopped in an intersection, preparing to make a left turn, when another driver collided with the rear of her vehicle. This impact pushed the first vehicle into oncoming traffic, causing a head-on collision with a third vehicle. The drivers of the first two vehicles claimed various injuries, including strains to their backs and necks, and soft-tissue injuries. The plaintiffs alleged the third driver failed to maintain a proper lookout or control his speed. The defense argued the first driver's turn signal and brake lights were not on, and the second driver failed to take evasive action.
One driver was injured in a car crash in Houston, Texas. The driver was a passenger in a vehicle that ran a red light and collided with another car. The initial crash caused the vehicle to hit three other cars. The injured person sustained soft tissue injuries to their back and shoulder.
One driver was operating a vehicle on a highway ramp when they struck a disabled vehicle that was partly in the roadway. The disabled vehicle's occupants had exited the vehicle for safety. The driver of the moving vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck.
Back strain and soft tissue injuries involve damage to the muscles, ligaments, and tendons supporting the spine and surrounding structures. These injuries occur when muscle fibers or ligaments stretch beyond their normal capacity or tear partially or completely. Soft tissue damage causes pain, swelling, muscle spasms, limited mobility, and inflammation that can range from mild discomfort to debilitating pain affecting daily activities.
Motor vehicle accidents cause back strains through sudden impact forces, awkward body positioning during collision, seatbelt compression against the torso, and violent jarring motions. Rear-end collisions frequently cause lower back strain as the body is thrust forward then snapped backward. Side-impact crashes can cause asymmetric muscle damage and uneven spinal stress. Even low-speed accidents can cause significant soft tissue damage that may not appear on X-rays or initial examinations.
Initial treatment includes rest, ice application, NSAIDs for pain and inflammation, and avoiding activities that aggravate symptoms. Physical therapy typically begins within 1-2 weeks to restore range of motion, strengthen supporting muscles, and prevent chronic dysfunction. Treatment may include manual therapy, therapeutic exercises, heat therapy, and electrical stimulation. Some cases require muscle relaxants, trigger point injections, or epidural steroid injections. Most soft tissue injuries improve within 6-12 weeks, though severe strains may require months of treatment and some develop chronic pain syndromes.
Soft tissue injury cases in Dallas-Fort Worth face scrutiny because damage doesn't appear on X-rays or CT scans, making them harder to 'prove' than fractures. Success depends on consistent medical treatment starting immediately after the accident, detailed documentation of pain and functional limitations, MRI evidence showing tissue damage or inflammation, and testimony from treating physicians. Gap in treatment or delayed care allows insurance companies to argue injuries are not accident-related. Physical therapy records showing objective functional improvements strengthen claims significantly.
Common questions about motor vehicle accident cases in Dallas-Fort Worth
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Case outcomes vary significantly based on individual circumstances. Past results are not guarantees of future outcomes. Always consult with a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.