A company that made highway guard rail end terminals was accused of violating the False Claims Act. The accuser claimed the company secretly modified the design, which led to vehicles impaling the guard rails and causing severe injuries. The company denied these allegations. A jury found in favor of the accuser and awarded damages, which were then trebled and increased by penalties, totaling over $663 million. However, an appeals court later overturned this judgment, stating the government had not declared the design unsafe.
Other Cases in Texas
This category includes various injury types not specifically classified, such as psychological trauma, hearing or vision loss, facial injuries, or dental damage. Case values depend on the specific nature and severity of the injuries sustained.
Last updated: November 2025
High-Level Statistics
One driver was operating an 18-wheeler. The case involved a collision.
A delivery truck struck a man who was standing in a loading dock. The case involved claims of motor vehicle negligence and vicarious liability.
One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The case involved expert testimony regarding economics, damages, and vocational evaluation. The injured person also received testimony from medical experts specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation, and orthopedic spinal surgery.
A tractor trailer driver caused a rear-end collision. The case involved expert testimony from specialists in rehabilitation psychology, vocational rehabilitation, life care planning, chronic pain management, aerospace medicine, occupational medicine, public health, and neurological surgery.
A homeowner sued their insurer after a hail storm damaged their house. The homeowner alleged that the insurance adjuster undervalued the damage during an inspection. The case went to a jury, which found in favor of the homeowner and awarded damages.
One driver's truck struck a power cable, causing it to fall onto another driver's vehicle. The injured driver sued, alleging negligence in the operation of the truck and in the transport of an oversized load. The case involved multiple defendants and complex legal arguments regarding liability and damages. Ultimately, one company was found solely liable for the incident.
One driver alleged that another driver, operating a commercial truck, was distracted by an electronic device. This distraction allegedly caused the truck to crash into the driver's vehicle, pushing it into another vehicle. The driver filed a lawsuit against the trucking company and the driver.
One driver was found to be mostly at fault for a rear-end collision. The crash resulted in injuries and lost earning capacity for the other driver. The jury awarded damages for past and future pain, impairment, and medical care.
A motor vehicle accident occurred. The case involved a plaintiff and defendants. Experts in economics, damages, and physical medicine were involved.
A sofa fell from a truck onto the road, causing a driver to swerve and initiate a motor vehicle accident. The case involved economic and damages experts.
One driver filed a negligence claim against another driver and their employer after a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff sought compensation for injuries sustained in the collision, including past and future medical expenses. The defendants contested the claim and the extent of damages. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding the defendants negligent and awarding damages for medical expenses.
A motor vehicle accident (MVA) encompasses any collision involving cars, trucks, motorcycles, or commercial vehicles resulting in property damage, injuries, or fatalities. As the second-largest state by both population and geographic area, Texas presents unique challenges for MVA cases: diverse driving conditions from dense urban centers like Houston and Dallas to rural highways spanning hundreds of miles, high traffic volumes on major interstate systems (I-35, I-45, I-10), and weather events ranging from flash floods to ice storms. Texas personal injury law allows victims to pursue compensation through insurance claims or civil litigation when another party's negligence caused the accident.
Injury patterns across Texas
Texas MVA cases span the full injury spectrum, with patterns varying by region. High-speed highway collisions on rural interstates often result in severe trauma including spinal cord injuries, multiple fractures, and internal organ damage. Urban accidents in cities like Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin more commonly involve rear-end collisions causing whiplash, soft tissue injuries, and concussions. Texas also sees significant motorcycle accidents, pedestrian strikes in growing urban cores, and commercial truck accidents on major freight corridors. Long-term injuries such as chronic pain, permanent disability, and cognitive impairment from traumatic brain injuries are consistently reported across the state.
Texas negligence law
Texas applies a modified comparative negligence standard (also called proportionate responsibility) under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 33.001. This means you can recover damages only if you are 50% or less at fault for the accident. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault—for example, if you're 20% at fault in a $100,000 case, you receive $80,000. Texas courts consider multiple factors when assigning fault: driver actions (speeding, failure to yield, distracted driving, intoxication), vehicle maintenance and defects, road design and maintenance issues, and third-party liability such as employers for commercial drivers. Expert testimony and accident reconstruction often play critical roles in establishing liability across Texas's varied accident scenarios.
What determines settlement amounts in Texas?
Case values in Texas MVA claims depend on economic damages (quantifiable losses including past and future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost wages, and diminished earning capacity), non-economic damages (pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, permanent scarring or disfigurement), and defendant characteristics (insurance policy limits, financial resources, and degree of fault). Texas does not cap non-economic damages in most MVA cases (caps apply primarily to medical malpractice). County-specific factors matter too—Harris County juries historically award higher verdicts than rural counties, while conservative jurisdictions may be more defense-friendly. The strength of your evidence, quality of legal representation, and whether you file in a favorable venue all significantly impact final outcomes.
Resolution timelines in Texas
Texas MVA cases typically resolve within 6-36 months depending on case complexity, injury severity, and litigation strategy. Simple cases with clear liability and cooperative insurers may settle in 3-6 months through pre-litigation negotiation. More complex cases involving disputed fault, severe injuries, or inadequate insurance offers generally require filing a lawsuit, adding 12-24 months for discovery, depositions, and settlement conferences. Cases proceeding to trial can take 24-36+ months given crowded court dockets across Texas counties. Remember: Texas law imposes a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims from the accident date (Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003). Missing this deadline typically bars your claim permanently.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about motor vehicle accident cases in Texas
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Case outcomes vary significantly based on individual circumstances. Past results are not guarantees of future outcomes. Always consult with a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.