White Oak, Texas Fatal Car Crash Settles for $5.5 Million
One driver crossed the center line and struck another vehicle head-on. The collision resulted in serious injuries and one fatality. The occupants of the struck vehicle sued the driver, his employer, and the vehicle's owner for negligence.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $5,500,000
- County
- Upshur County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Head-on
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A multi-vehicle collision occurred on Highway 80 in White Oak, Texas, when a westbound pickup truck crossed the center line and struck an eastbound sedan. The collision resulted in fatal injuries for an adult passenger in the sedan, while the sedan's driver sustained a sternum fracture and lung contusions. A child passenger in the sedan received emergency medical attention but suffered no lasting injuries.
The injured driver, the decedent's estate, and the child's representative filed a lawsuit. They alleged the pickup truck's driver was negligent in failing to maintain control of the vehicle. Claims were also brought against the driver's employer, a car-detailing service, for negligent hiring and training, and against the vehicle's owner, a car dealership, along with its owners, for negligent entrustment of the vehicle. The defendants denied negligence. The dealership and its owners argued their entrustment of the vehicle to the driver had ended prior to the accident, contending that the detailing service was responsible for the vehicle's entrustment on the day of the crash.
The decedent sustained severe abdominal injuries, including small-bowel perforations, and died three days after the incident. The injured driver required hospital observation and subsequent chiropractic treatment. The plaintiffs sought damages for medical expenses, lost earnings for the decedent's estate, and wrongful death claims for loss of companionship and mental anguish.
The case concluded with a $5.5 million settlement after extensive discovery. The defendants tendered their policy limits in response to a Stowers demand, resulting in the total proceeds.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Upshur County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.