Weatherford Jury Awards $55,787 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver rear-ended them. A third driver then rear-ended the second driver, pushing them into the first driver. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, including disc bulges and protrusions. They sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain and suffering, and physical impairment. The defense argued that the injuries were self-limiting and that some treatments were not reasonable or necessary.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $55,787
- County
- Parker County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In March 2013, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on 4th Street in Weatherford. A plaintiff, an electrician, was driving a 2006 Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck and stopping in a line of traffic when a 2011 Hyundai Elantra, driven by a first defendant, rear-ended his vehicle. Immediately afterward, a 2011 Chevrolet 1500 pickup truck, driven by a second defendant, rear-ended the first defendant's vehicle, pushing it further into the plaintiff's truck. A police report listed the second defendant's failure to control speed and inattention as contributing factors.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against both drivers, alleging they negligently failed to maintain a proper lookout and control their speed. The plaintiff claimed cervical sprains and strains, as well as disc bulges and protrusions in his lower back, requiring extensive chiropractic care and two rounds of epidural steroid injections. His medical bills totaled over $50,000, and he sought substantial damages for future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering, arguing the second defendant was 95 percent responsible for the incident. The first defendant contended that the second defendant was primarily at fault for the severe impact. The second defendant acknowledged some negligence but disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, arguing that treatment was excessive, the injuries were self-limiting, and an MRI revealed pre-existing degenerative changes.
After a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before reaching a verdict. The jury found both defendants negligent, apportioning 95 percent of the responsibility to the second defendant and 5 percent to the first defendant. The plaintiff was awarded $55,787.09 in damages. Including prejudgment interest and taxable costs, the final judgment totaled $64,197.67.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Parker County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.