Washington Jury Awards Over $33 Million in Complex Personal Injury
One driver was involved in a crash that resulted in serious injuries. The case involved claims related to future lost wages, medical expenses, and damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $36,093,664
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A Washington state jury awarded the plaintiff substantial damages in a personal injury case on April 9, 2018. The case involved complex technical claims, drawing on expert testimony from various fields.
The jury awarded a total of over $33 million. This included $709,612 for future lost wages or earning capacity, $15,333,562 for future medical and life care expenses, $2,117,000 in past non-economic damages, and $15,330,000 in future non-economic damages.
During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented experts in human factors/biomechanics, vehicle design, vehicle handling/dynamics, product safety, accident reconstruction, life care planning, economics, and physiatry specializing in spinal cord injuries. The defendant countered with experts in accident reconstruction, vehicle design, human factors/biomechanics, life care planning, economics, physiatry, and sleep medicine. The substantial award indicated the jury found in favor of the plaintiff's arguments and assessment of damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.