Victoria Jury Awards $160,000 in Negligent Rear-End Collision
One driver was turning when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case went to trial, and the jury found the driver who caused the collision fully liable for the damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $160,000
- County
- Victoria County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A driver sustained back and neck injuries following a rear-end collision in Victoria on September 28, 2019. The plaintiff's vehicle was struck from behind by a sport utility vehicle, driven by the defendant, while executing a right turn. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligent operation of a vehicle. A judge directed a verdict, finding the defendant fully liable for the collision.
The case then proceeded to a trial on damages. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered sprains and strains in the cervical and lumbar regions, along with spinal-joint dysfunction, after the incident. Treatment initially involved a hospital visit, followed by chiropractic care for several months, with a later brief resumption of treatment. A chiropractic expert testified that the plaintiff could expect further pain requiring future surgery and injections. The plaintiff sought to recover $244,000 for past and future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, physical pain and mental anguish, and physical impairment.
The defense contended that the accident was a minor collision incapable of causing the claimed injuries. The defense highlighted that the plaintiff's initial complaints and diagnoses were limited to the neck until chiropractic treatment began, and that the plaintiff did not pursue an evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon. The defense also pointed to a gap in treatment and argued the plaintiff was exaggerating the complaints, suggesting an award of $18,000 if damages were to be granted.
After a two-day trial, a jury deliberated for three hours before returning a verdict. The jury determined the plaintiff's total damages to be $160,000. This award included compensation for past medical costs, future medical costs, past physical impairment, future physical impairment, past physical pain and mental anguish, future physical pain and mental anguish, and past loss of earning capacity.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Victoria County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.