Texas Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $10,000
One driver claimed they were injured when another driver rear-ended their vehicle, pushing it into the car in front. The injured driver said they experienced neck and back pain and had ongoing limitations. The other driver argued that the minor vehicle damage and a gap in treatment suggested the injuries were not permanent. The jury found the defendant driver fully responsible and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Multiple Vehicle Collision
Case Overview
A motor vehicle negligence action was filed following a rear-end collision. The plaintiff driver contended that the defendant driver struck their vehicle from behind, propelling it into a vehicle ahead and causing neck and back pain that the plaintiff asserted was permanent. The plaintiff sought $30,000.
The defendant did not strongly dispute liability but contested the extent and permanence of the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The defense argued that a significant gap in the plaintiff's medical treatment, after an initial period of conservative care, indicated that any injuries were short-term and had resolved. Photographs showing minor damage to the plaintiff's vehicle were also presented. The defendant had offered $13,000 to settle the case.
A jury found the defendant 100% negligent for the incident. The jury awarded the plaintiff $10,000 in damages, which included $9,000 for past medical bills and $1,000 for past pain and suffering.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.