Texas Jury Awards $54.47M in Multi-Vehicle Collision
A 19-year-old man was a passenger in a vehicle that attempted a U-turn and was struck by another vehicle. The passenger was not wearing a seatbelt and sustained a spinal fracture that resulted in paraplegia. He sued the driver of the second vehicle and their employer, alleging negligent following distance and training. The defense argued the U-turn driver was solely responsible and that the passenger's failure to wear a seatbelt caused his injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $67,470,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 28, 2012, near Orange Grove, Texas, a passenger in a Ford Sport Trac sustained severe injuries in a multi-vehicle collision. The incident occurred when the Sport Trac's driver attempted a U-turn on FM 624, colliding with an eastbound van. The Sport Trac then spun into the path of a second eastbound vehicle, a Chevrolet Silverado owned by a corporate defendant and driven by its employee, which struck the Sport Trac on the passenger side. The passenger, who was not wearing a seatbelt, suffered a spinal fracture that resulted in paraplegia.
The plaintiff passenger sued the Silverado's driver and his employer, alleging the driver followed too closely and that the employer was negligent in training its drivers on safe following distances. A plaintiff's accident reconstruction expert testified the Silverado was likely 80 to 140 feet behind the Sport Trac, an insufficient distance according to a plaintiff's trucking safety expert. The defendants denied negligence, asserting that the Sport Trac's driver, identified as a responsible third party, was solely responsible for making an illegal U-turn without proper lookout. A defense accident reconstruction expert testified the Silverado was following at a safe distance of 220 to 410 feet. The defendants also argued the plaintiff bore comparative liability for not wearing a seatbelt. Conflicting expert testimony was presented regarding the seatbelt's role in the spinal fracture and the potential for fatal injuries with or without its use.
The plaintiff sustained a burst fracture at L1, leading to permanent paraplegia, along with other spinal and internal injuries, requiring extensive hospitalization, surgery, and rehabilitation. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and punitive damages, with experts estimating millions in future care and lost earnings.
After an eight-day trial, a jury found the corporate defendant 34 percent liable, the Sport Trac's driver 30 percent liable, the Silverado's driver 28 percent liable, and the plaintiff 8 percent comparatively liable. The jury awarded $34.22 million in actual damages, reduced to $21.22 million due to comparative liability. Additionally, the jury awarded $33 million in punitive damages against the corporate defendant and $250,000 against its employee, resulting in a total net verdict of $54.47 million for the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
In Dallas County, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit after experiencing neck and back injuries in a rear-end collision. The plaintiff alleged the defendant's negligence caused the incident and sought damages for physical pain, impairment, and medical expenses. Prior to trial, the parties engaged in mediation, but the case proceeded to a jury. During the trial, the plaintiff presented testimony from an orthopedic medical expert regarding the injuries sustained. The defendant did not present any expert testimony. The jury ultimately returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded total damages of $7,131. This amount included $1,000 for past physical pain and suffering, $2,000 for past physical impairment, and $4,131 for past medical care. The jury awarded no damages for future pain and suffering, future physical impairment, or past and future mental anguish.
A civil case involving a plaintiff, who also acted as next friend for a second individual, and a defendant concluded in Texas on April 30, 2015. Few details were available regarding the specific incident that led to the lawsuit, the legal claims presented by either side, or the ultimate resolution of the dispute.
On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.
On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.
A plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit in Dallas County, Texas, alleging that on April 2, 2012, a defendant negligently operated a vehicle. The plaintiff claimed the defendant failed to yield while making a turn, causing a collision with the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged injuries from the incident. The lawsuit was filed on April 1, 2014, in the District Court, 14th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. The parties later reached a settlement agreement on June 26, 2015. Under the terms, the plaintiff accepted $7,000 in full settlement of all claims. On July 9, 2015, the court entered an agreed order dismissing the case with prejudice based on the parties' joint motion.