Texas Jury Awards $3,280.37 in Motor Vehicle Backing Accident
One driver was backing out of a parking space when she struck a stationary car. The driver of the stationary car was not present. The driver who was backing out was sued by her passenger, who claimed injuries from the collision. The passenger sought damages for medical bills and pain and suffering. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing and the impact was minor.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,280
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Back and Neck, Strains and Sprains, Soft Tissue
Case Overview
On May 13, 2009, in Texas, a driver was backing a mid-size sport-utility vehicle with her son as a passenger when she struck a stationary compact car. The compact car's owner was uninsured, but the driver's vehicle carried liability and uninsured motorist coverage through State Farm Mutual Insurance Company of Texas. The passenger later sought emergency room treatment, chiropractic care, and specialized medical consultations, claiming neck and back sprains, a cervical disc protrusion, and a lumbar disc bulge. His medical bills exceeded $13,000.
The passenger, as plaintiff, sued his mother, the driver, alleging unsafe backing. Alternatively, he sued the owner of the parked car for failing to maintain a proper lookout and the insurer for uninsured motorist benefits. The parked car's owner was not present during the incident. The defendant-driver contended that her son's allegations were baseless regarding both liability and damages.
Before trial, the court granted directed verdicts to the parked car's owner and the insurer. During the two-day trial, the plaintiff sought damages for medical bills, physical pain, and mental anguish. The defense argued that the plaintiff's claimed injuries were wholly pre-existing, citing conditions such as degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis. The defense also presented photographs showing minimal vehicle damage, suggesting a minor impact.
A jury found the driver negligent and awarded the plaintiff $3,280.37 for past medical bills. The jury did not award damages for physical pain and mental anguish. Following the verdict, the plaintiff's counsel filed a motion for judgment, while the defendant's counsel argued for a $2,500 credit for personal injury protection payments made by the driver's insurer.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.