Texas Jury Awards $170,850 After Comparative Liability in Rear-End Collision
One driver was traveling east on a boulevard in rainy conditions when he collided with the rear of a construction vehicle. The driver claimed the construction vehicle had no lights or warning signs, making it difficult to see. The defense argued the driver was speeding and potentially intoxicated. The driver sustained fractures and later developed an infection requiring multiple surgeries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $335,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Leg / Foot Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On October 20, 2012, a plaintiff driving a 1989 Chevrolet Suburban was involved in a rear-end collision with an eastbound telehandler construction vehicle on Kingsland Boulevard during rainy conditions. The telehandler was owned by a masonry subcontractor working on a construction project for a general contractor. The plaintiff sustained multiple injuries and subsequently filed a negligence lawsuit against the telehandler operator, the subcontractor, and the general contractor.
The plaintiff alleged the defendants failed to provide adequate warning or notice of the construction activity, claiming the telehandler lacked lights and a slow-moving vehicle sign, making it impossible to see in the adverse weather. A construction safety expert for the plaintiff testified that the defendants had violated contractual agreements and state regulations by not providing warning devices such as flagmen or escort vehicles. An accident reconstruction expert stated the plaintiff was traveling at or under the speed limit at the time of the impact. The plaintiff suffered compound fractures to the right tibia and talus, which led to multiple surgeries, a staph infection requiring additional debridements, and a bone graft. The plaintiff claimed significant scarring, a permanent severe limp, and sought damages for past medical expenses, as well as past and future pain and suffering, physical impairment, and disfigurement.
Defense counsel argued the plaintiff bore comparative liability, presenting a witness who testified the plaintiff was traveling at an excessive rate of speed just prior to the collision. The defense also maintained the plaintiff was intoxicated at the scene and failed to mitigate damages by leaving the hospital against medical advice and not adhering to physician's orders, including a failure to stop smoking, which allegedly caused the infection and prolonged healing. The plaintiff countered that no evidence of intoxication was produced, such as blood or urine tests, and that the plaintiff was retrieving a cell phone from the vehicle, which was visibly too damaged to drive.
After a three-day trial and 3.75 hours of deliberation, the jury found the telehandler operator 1% liable, the general contractor 15% liable, the subcontractor 35% liable, and the plaintiff 49% comparatively liable. The jury awarded the plaintiff $335,000, which was then reduced to $170,850 due to the finding of comparative liability.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On August 14, 2014, a vehicular collision occurred in Houston, Texas, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendant, operating a company vehicle within the scope of employment, was traveling at an excessive rate of speed, failed to maintain a proper lookout, and did not keep a safe distance, causing severe injuries to the plaintiff's cervical and lumbar spine. The plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit, claiming the defendant's actions led to significant neck and back disc injuries. The defendant failed to answer the complaint, resulting in a default judgment entered by the court. The court awarded the plaintiff $364,305 in damages. This included $200,000 for pain and suffering, $14,305 for past medical expenses, and $150,000 for future medical expenses. The judgment was granted due to the defendant's failure to respond to the legal complaint.
On October 10, 2012, a vehicular collision occurred on West 34th Street in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff was driving eastbound when she slowed for traffic, and her vehicle was struck from the rear by a defendant's vehicle. The force of the impact pushed the plaintiff's car into the automobile in front of hers. The plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit, asserting the defendant failed to maintain a proper lookout, apply brakes in a timely manner, and manage an assured clear distance. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff claimed to have suffered a blow to the head, lost consciousness, and was diagnosed with a concussion, a hematoma of the head, broken ribs, a collarbone, and a pelvis. She further alleged permanent brain injury affecting memory, balance, and causing tremors, in addition to depression. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence, contending the plaintiff caused the accident by making a right turn from a driveway into traffic and then suddenly braking. The defendant also disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, maintaining that some were unrelated to the collision and resulted from pre-existing illness, disease, or another accident. After hearing the arguments, a jury found the defendant 100% liable for the accident. The plaintiff was awarded $70,000 in past damages.
On March 13, 2012, a plaintiff was injured in a multi-vehicle collision while driving in slow traffic near Highway 59 in Houston, Texas. The defendant driver reportedly swerved into the plaintiff's lane, striking a vehicle behind the plaintiff, which then collided with the rear of the plaintiff's slowing car. The plaintiff subsequently filed a vehicular negligence action. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, operating a vehicle unsafely, and failing to apply brakes in a timely manner, which led to injuries including to the chest, neck, back, and a partial to full thickness tear of the right rotator cuff. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury. Following the proceedings, the court found the defendant negligent and that this negligence caused harm to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $10,000 for past pain and suffering, $10,000 for past disfigurement, and $10,003 for past medical expenses, totaling $30,003.
A plaintiff filed a vehicular negligence action after his stopped vehicle was struck from the rear by a defendant's vehicle on April 10, 2014, at an intersection in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control the vehicle, maintain a proper lookout, and take evasive action. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained an ankle sprain and discogenic injuries to the cervical and lumbar spine as a result of the collision. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence, including that the plaintiff sustained serious or permanent injuries from the accident. A jury ultimately found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $16,361 for past damages and an additional $10,000 for future damages.
An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.