Texas Judge Rules in Vehicle Contract Default, Awards $11,784.53
One party filed a lawsuit regarding defaulted contracts and a security interest in a vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendants failed to make payments and granted a security interest in the vehicle. The plaintiff attempted to perfect this security interest, but the Department of Motor Vehicles refused to process the request. The defendants failed to surrender the vehicle or pay their debts. The court entered a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff for unpaid balances, attorney's fees, and costs.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $15,515
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
A finance company initiated a lawsuit in March 2020 against two individuals and the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (TxDMV) concerning defaulted contracts for a 2006 Chevrolet Corvette. The plaintiff alleged one individual signed a contract in June 2016, and both individuals jointly signed a second contract later that month. The plaintiff claimed both parties subsequently defaulted by failing to make required monthly payments.
The plaintiff asserted it held a security interest in the Corvette, but TxDMV refused to process its request to perfect this interest. The plaintiff also alleged the individual defendants failed to surrender the vehicle or pay their outstanding debts despite written demands. TxDMV filed an answer denying the allegations, stating it was not a real party in interest in the litigation, though it noted it had placed a notation in motor vehicle records regarding the pending lawsuit. The individual defendants did not file answers after being served.
In August 2020, the plaintiff sought a nonsuit of claims against TxDMV and requested a default judgment against the individual defendants due to their failure to respond. The court granted the plaintiff's requests. Claims against TxDMV and for possession of the collateral were dismissed without prejudice. A final default judgment was entered against the individual defendants, awarding the plaintiff a net unpaid balance of $4,230.65 against one defendant individually, and $10,483.03 against both defendants jointly and severally. The court also awarded the plaintiff $900.00 in attorney's fees and $401.50 in court costs.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.