Texas Judge Awards $81,806 in Jersey Village Car Crash
One driver's vehicle was damaged in a collision with another vehicle at an intersection. The insurance company for the damaged vehicle compensated its insured and then sued the other driver, alleging negligence caused the crash. The defendant claimed they were not responsible. The court ruled in favor of the insurance company, awarding the full amount of damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $81,806
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On June 9, 2019, a vehicle insured by Government Employees Insurance Company, Inc. (GEICO) collided with another vehicle at US-290 and West Road in Jersey Village, Texas. GEICO compensated its insured for the loss, totaling $81,806.58, which included property damage and medical expenses for three individuals. GEICO filed a subrogation lawsuit against the other vehicle's operator on February 2, 2020, alleging negligence caused the incident.
The defendant denied responsibility, claiming the plaintiff's insured's vehicle T-boned his. The case went to mandatory mediation and a bench trial. On October 4, 2021, the court ruled in favor of GEICO, entering a Final Judgment the next day. The court awarded GEICO the full $81,806.58 claimed, plus prejudgment interest, court costs, and post-judgment interest at 5.00% per year. This outcome represented a complete recovery for the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A case was filed in Texas by the plaintiffs against an individual defendant and defendant Rockwell Collins, Inc. Few details were available regarding the incident that led to the lawsuit or the specific legal claims asserted. The record indicated the case concluded on June 12, 2015. No further information was provided regarding the arguments of each side, the outcome, or the reasons for the verdict or judgment.
On October 10, 2012, a vehicular collision occurred on West 34th Street in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff was driving eastbound when she slowed for traffic, and her vehicle was struck from the rear by a defendant's vehicle. The force of the impact pushed the plaintiff's car into the automobile in front of hers. The plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit, asserting the defendant failed to maintain a proper lookout, apply brakes in a timely manner, and manage an assured clear distance. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff claimed to have suffered a blow to the head, lost consciousness, and was diagnosed with a concussion, a hematoma of the head, broken ribs, a collarbone, and a pelvis. She further alleged permanent brain injury affecting memory, balance, and causing tremors, in addition to depression. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence, contending the plaintiff caused the accident by making a right turn from a driveway into traffic and then suddenly braking. The defendant also disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, maintaining that some were unrelated to the collision and resulted from pre-existing illness, disease, or another accident. After hearing the arguments, a jury found the defendant 100% liable for the accident. The plaintiff was awarded $70,000 in past damages.
On June 6, 2013, a rear-end collision occurred in Houston, TX, involving two vehicles traveling northbound. The plaintiff driver alleged that the defendant driver, operating a vehicle owned by the defendant owner, negligently collided into the rear of the plaintiff's vehicle. As a result, the plaintiff claimed to have suffered neck, back, and shoulder injuries, with the shoulder injuries requiring acromionectomy surgery. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging negligence. The defendants admitted liability for the collision itself but disputed the nature, extent, and causation of the plaintiff's claimed injuries and damages. Specifically, the defense argued that the plaintiff had a pre-existing shoulder injury and that the shoulder issues were not causally related to the crash. The matter proceeded to a bench trial. The court found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded total damages of $130,842. This amount included $103,842 for medical expenses, $2,500 for past impairment, and $20,000 for future medical expenses.
On March 13, 2012, a plaintiff was injured in a multi-vehicle collision while driving in slow traffic near Highway 59 in Houston, Texas. The defendant driver reportedly swerved into the plaintiff's lane, striking a vehicle behind the plaintiff, which then collided with the rear of the plaintiff's slowing car. The plaintiff subsequently filed a vehicular negligence action. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, operating a vehicle unsafely, and failing to apply brakes in a timely manner, which led to injuries including to the chest, neck, back, and a partial to full thickness tear of the right rotator cuff. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury. Following the proceedings, the court found the defendant negligent and that this negligence caused harm to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $10,000 for past pain and suffering, $10,000 for past disfigurement, and $10,003 for past medical expenses, totaling $30,003.
A plaintiff filed a vehicular negligence action after his stopped vehicle was struck from the rear by a defendant's vehicle on April 10, 2014, at an intersection in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control the vehicle, maintain a proper lookout, and take evasive action. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained an ankle sprain and discogenic injuries to the cervical and lumbar spine as a result of the collision. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence, including that the plaintiff sustained serious or permanent injuries from the accident. A jury ultimately found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $16,361 for past damages and an additional $10,000 for future damages.