Texas Default Judgment Awards $34,952 in Motor Vehicle Accident
One insurance company sued two individuals after a car accident. The company alleged that one of the individuals negligently caused the collision, resulting in damages. The company also alleged that the other individual negligently entrusted his vehicle to an incompetent driver. After difficulties serving the defendants, the court granted a default judgment against one of them for the damages sought.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $34,451
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On July 22, 2020, an insurer filed a lawsuit seeking subrogation for damages related to a motor vehicle accident that occurred on September 9, 2018. The plaintiff alleged that a vehicle owned by its insured was damaged due to the negligent operation of a vehicle by one defendant. The collision resulted in damages of $34,451.55, which the plaintiff compensated its insured for, becoming subrogated in that amount. The plaintiff also alleged that the second defendant owned the vehicle involved and negligently entrusted it to the driver.
The plaintiff encountered difficulties serving the defendants. After multiple unsuccessful attempts, the court in Texas granted a motion for alternative service against the driver on October 27, 2020. The driver was eventually served but failed to file an answer. The plaintiff also noted ongoing difficulties serving the vehicle owner.
On March 15, 2021, the plaintiff filed a notice of partial nonsuit without prejudice against the vehicle owner, which the court granted. Two days later, on March 17, 2021, the court entered a default judgment against the driver due to the failure to respond. The judgment, later confirmed on August 12, 2021, awarded the plaintiff $34,451.55 in damages, $500.00 in attorney's fees pursuant to Texas Insurance Code § 542.302, court costs, and interest.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.