Texarkana Jury Awards $12,000 After Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries, including herniated discs and aggravation of a pre-existing hip condition. Medical experts disagreed on whether the injuries were caused by the accident or pre-existing conditions. The jury awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $12,000
- County
- Bowie County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In February 2012, a 46-year-old painter was operating a pickup truck in Texarkana when his vehicle was rear-ended by a dump truck while stopped in traffic. The dump truck driver stipulated to liability for the collision. The injured driver filed a lawsuit against the dump truck driver, alleging negligence, including failure to keep a proper lookout, control speed, and brake. The lawsuit also named the dump truck owner for negligent entrustment, but this claim was not presented to the jury.
The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries, including herniated cervical discs, radiating arm pain, lumbar sprains, aggravation of a pre-existing hip condition requiring future hip replacement, and an abdominal hernia, all attributed to the accident. Following an emergency room visit, the plaintiff underwent chiropractic care, physical therapy, epidural steroid injections, and eventually cervical fusion surgery and abdominal hernia repair. The plaintiff's orthopedic surgery experts testified that the hip injury was exacerbated by the accident and would necessitate replacement. The plaintiff sought $1.475 million in damages for past and future medical bills, lost earning capacity, pain, and physical impairment.
The defense countered by highlighting an initial MRI showing no disc herniations shortly after the accident, with a defense neurosurgeon testifying that later-observed herniations were degenerative and unrelated. The defense also argued that the hip condition would have deteriorated regardless of the incident and that the abdominal hernia's relation to the accident lacked expert testimony. The defense suggested only the first 90 days of treatment were accident-related and, after the plaintiff claimed lost earning capacity during trial, presented evidence that the plaintiff had not filed tax returns in the preceding six years.
After a four-day trial, the jury awarded the plaintiff $12,000 against the dump truck driver. The verdict indicated that the jury found the defendant responsible for some damages but significantly less than the amount sought by the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Bowie County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.