Tarrant County Jury Awards $3,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, which then struck the vehicle in front of it. The driver of the first vehicle claimed soft tissue injuries and a concussion. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the extent of the injuries. The jury found negligence on the part of one driver and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,000
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On November 28, 2015, a three-vehicle collision occurred on Interstate 20 in Tarrant County. The plaintiff, driving a sport utility vehicle, was exiting the freeway when traffic backed up. The second driver, in a Honda Accord, was behind the plaintiff, and a third driver, also in a Honda Accord, was behind the second driver. The third driver rear-ended the second driver, whose vehicle then allegedly struck the plaintiff's SUV. The third driver received a traffic ticket following the incident.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against both the second and third drivers, alleging negligence in operating their vehicles. The plaintiff claimed both defendants failed to maintain a proper lookout, control their speed, avoid following too closely, or brake in time. The plaintiff sought damages for multiple soft tissue injuries, including sprains and strains to the neck, back, shoulder, knee, and ankle, as well as a mild concussion and headaches. Medical expenses for past and future treatment, along with compensation for past and future pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment, were sought.
The third driver argued the collision was an accident caused by stop-and-go traffic and that their driving did not constitute negligence. The second driver contended that any impact with the plaintiff's vehicle was minor and occurred only because their car was pushed forward by the third driver's vehicle. The defense generally disputed the severity of the impact and the extent of the plaintiff's claimed injuries and ongoing pain, presenting counter affidavits from medical experts who opined on the reasonableness and necessity of certain medical treatments.
After a four-day trial and one hour of deliberation, the jury found negligence and proximate cause solely against the third driver. No damages were awarded against the second driver. The jury awarded the plaintiff $3,000.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.