Tarrant County Jury Awards $1,000 in Red-Light Collision
One driver ran a red light and struck another driver's vehicle. The insurance carrier accepted liability and offered a settlement. The injured driver sued, claiming the vehicle's valuation was too low and seeking additional fees. The defense argued against storage and rental fees, suggesting a lower valuation for the vehicle. The jury awarded the injured driver $1,000.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1,000
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On December 12, 2013, an accident occurred in Tarrant County, Texas, when a defendant driving a vehicle ran a red light and struck the plaintiff's 1994 Ford Mustang GT. The collision caused moderate damage to the plaintiff's car, which the defendant's insurance carrier subsequently declared a total loss. The carrier initially offered the plaintiff either $559.71 to keep the vehicle or $1,294.94 if the carrier retained it.
The plaintiff, a body shop owner, filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for running the red light and failing to yield the right of way. The defendant stipulated to negligence, having admitted to the investigating officer that she ran the light, a fact corroborated by two eyewitnesses. The plaintiff, representing himself at trial, contended that the insurance carrier's valuation of his vehicle was too low. He sought $4,252 for the actual cash value of the Mustang, presenting NADAguides, Kelley Blue Book printouts, and Craigslist postings to support his valuation, which he argued was conservative given a recently installed new engine. The plaintiff also sought additional damages including property taxes, vehicle registration, towing, storage fees, rental car fees, and administrative and court costs, totaling $7,555.25.
The defense countered that the plaintiff provided no documentation for a new engine and argued that the engine, if new and undamaged, could be removed and sold for $2,750, with the remaining vehicle sold for scrap at $1,000. The defense suggested that if the jury accepted the plaintiff's $4,252 valuation, they should subtract these amounts, resulting in an award of approximately $500. The defense further argued that the plaintiff did not incur actual storage fees, as the car was stored at his own body shop, and did not incur rental fees, as he was able to drive the car from the scene. The defense characterized the Mustang as a "hobby car" rather than primary transportation and argued that rental reimbursement was not appropriate for a vehicle declared a total loss. Defense counsel requested the jury award only $375 for towing.
Following a one-day trial, the jury deliberated and returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $1,000.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.