Sugar Land Jury Awards $8,730 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was approaching a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. This caused the first car to then strike the rear of a vehicle in front of it. The driver who was hit from behind claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the second driver was negligent for failing to exercise due caution.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $8,730
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On November 30, 2016, a 23-year-old laborer was driving on University Avenue in Sugar Land when a trailing vehicle struck the rear of his car. The impact propelled his vehicle forward, causing it to collide with a preceding vehicle. The plaintiff claimed to suffer injuries to his back and neck as a result.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the trailing driver, alleging negligence in vehicle operation and failure to exercise due caution. The plaintiff contended that he braked aggressively due to the preceding motorist and a yellow traffic signal, and that the defendant failed to control her vehicle's speed. An investigating police report listed failure to control speed as the sole contributing factor for the defendant. The defendant argued she braked promptly but her car skidded, claiming the accident resulted from the abrupt braking of the third motorist. The jury received an unavoidable-accident instruction.
The plaintiff claimed herniated lumbar discs and cervical sprains/strains, seeking over $90,000 for past medical expenses, past and future physical pain, and past physical impairment. The defense challenged the reasonableness of treatment costs, particularly a $10,000 epidural injection. The defense also questioned the plaintiff's credibility, noting he had denied a prior basketball injury during a deposition despite having sustained one a year prior to the collision. Arguments were also made that the impact was minor given the extent of treatment, and that the plaintiff appeared physically fit despite claims of ongoing pain and limitations.
After a one-day trial, the jury found the defendant liable for the accident. However, the jury awarded the plaintiff $8,730 in damages, consisting of $4,800 for past medical costs and $3,930 for past physical pain. The significantly reduced award likely reflected the jury's consideration of the defense's arguments regarding the plaintiff's credibility, the minor nature of the impact, and the reasonableness of the claimed medical treatment.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.