Smith County DWI Rear-End Collision Settles for $1.1 Million
One driver was traveling on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a pickup truck. The driver of the pickup truck was arrested for DWI. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their necks, backs, and hips. The case involved claims of negligence against the pickup truck driver and their employer for negligent hiring and entrustment. The case ultimately settled.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $1,100,000
- County
- Smith County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On September 16, 2016, a sport utility vehicle carrying two plaintiffs was traveling on Mineola Highway in Smith County when its rear end was struck by a trailing pickup truck. The pickup truck was driven by a defendant employee. Following the collision, the defendant driver failed field sobriety tests, was arrested for driving while intoxicated, and was later convicted. A breath test two hours after the accident showed a blood alcohol concentration of 0.176. One plaintiff claimed neck injuries, including disc herniations, while the other plaintiff reported back and hip injuries, including a herniated disc.
The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant driver and the driver's employer. They alleged that the defendant driver was negligent and grossly negligent in operating the employer's vehicle. Furthermore, the plaintiffs claimed the employer was negligent and grossly negligent in its hiring and entrustment of the vehicle, citing the defendant driver's prior driving offenses, including a 1985 conviction and a 2010 arrest for DWI. The plaintiffs presented evidence that the employer allegedly failed to conduct criminal background checks or verify the driver's account of the 2010 incident, despite internal policies regarding DWI convictions.
The defendants acknowledged that the driver was within the course and scope of employment at the time of the accident and was solely responsible for the collision. However, the defense argued that the driver's prior convictions were too remote to establish negligent hiring or entrustment. The defense also disputed the extent of the plaintiffs' claimed injuries, asserting that medical records indicated rapid resolution of symptoms or that some conditions were pre-existing and unrelated to the accident. One plaintiff incurred approximately $190,000 in medical expenses, undergoing chiropractic care, epidural steroid injections, and a cervical discectomy and fusion. The other plaintiff incurred about $24,000 in medical expenses, received injections, and was recommended for lumbar surgery.
The case concluded in mediation with a settlement of $1.1 million. The defendants had two insurance policies from the same carrier, totaling $2 million in coverage.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Smith County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.