San Antonio Jury Awards $229,900 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when another driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed back, neck, and shoulder pain. She received treatment including chiropractic care, physical therapy, and injections. A later MRI showed a disc bulge. She later had another accident which aggravated her condition. The defense argued her issues were pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $229,900
- County
- Bexar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 12, 2012, a sales clerk was rear-ended in San Antonio while driving a compact car, claiming back injuries. The incident occurred at a yield sign as she waited to enter a freeway access road. The plaintiff settled with the at-fault driver for their $30,000 policy limit and then sued her underinsured motorist insurer, the defendant, for additional benefits. The defendant stipulated to the at-fault driver's negligence, so the trial focused on causation and damages.
The plaintiff underwent extensive medical treatment for her back injuries, including chiropractic care, physical therapy, pain medication, injections, and a lumbar MRI which showed a disc bulge and spondylosis. An orthopedic surgeon later recommended a laminectomy and discectomy, estimated to cost $162,000. While the plaintiff had pre-existing scoliosis and prior chiropractic care, her counsel emphasized she had no prior MRI or surgery recommendation before the 2012 accident. She experienced another motor vehicle accident in April 2014, which she acknowledged aggravated her disc bulge, but maintained that some ongoing pain stemmed from the 2012 collision.
The defense argued the plaintiff's complaints were linked to pre-existing conditions, citing her scoliosis and prior chiropractic records, which included a reference to another 2007 motor vehicle accident. They also contended that her ongoing pain was primarily due to the 2014 accident and highlighted the time gap since her surgical recommendation and last treatment. After a one-day trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $229,900. This amount was offset by the $30,000 received from the at-fault driver, resulting in a net award of $199,900. However, the plaintiff's recovery was ultimately limited to her $50,000 underinsured motorist policy limit.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Bexar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.