Philadelphia Jury Finds Split Liability, Awards $156K in Motorcycle Crash

A truck driver filed a negligence claim against another driver and a logistics company following a motor vehicle accident that occurred on August 12, 2019. The defendant driver was an employee of the defendant logistics company and was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the incident, making the company vicariously liable for his actions. The plaintiff sought compensation for injuries sustained in the collision. The plaintiff presented evidence of past and future medical expenses resulting from the injuries. The defendants contested the negligence claim and disputed the extent of damages sought by the plaintiff. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendants were negligent in causing the motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff was awarded a total of $535,392.41 in compensatory damages, which included $164,484.00 for past medical expenses and $370,908.41 for future medical expenses. The judgment was entered against both the defendant driver and the defendant company.

On July 31, 2015, a vehicle carrying a woman and her daughter as passengers was traveling northbound on I-295 in West Deptford Township, New Jersey. Ahead of their vehicle, a cement truck owned by a concrete products company experienced a tire tread failure. The tread became a roadway hazard, causing the plaintiffs' vehicle to swerve, strike a guardrail, and overturn. The injured woman suffered an arm amputation, and her daughter suffered a leg amputation. The tire had been retreaded by tire service companies. The injured woman and her daughter, along with other passengers from their vehicle, filed a lawsuit in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. The complaint alleged negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress against the concrete products company, the tire manufacturer, and the tire retreaders, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants denied negligence. Prior to and during a nine-week trial, several confidential settlements were reached. Following an appellate decision in the plaintiffs' favor, the tire manufacturer and one tire retreader settled for confidential sums. Another tire retreader settled on the third day of trial. The concrete products company settled with the minor child plaintiff and a third passenger during the trial, but did not settle with the injured woman. At trial, the injured woman argued that the concrete products company was negligent in its pre-trip inspection, failing to detect a large bolt in the tire. She also contended the company was negligent for not contacting emergency services, despite the tire tread remaining on the roadway for almost 30 minutes and causing multiple crashes. The concrete products company argued that the driver of the plaintiffs' vehicle was negligent in reacting to the roadway hazard. After three days of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the injured woman, awarding her $10.6 million in compensatory damages and an additional $1.1 million in delay damages.

A motor vehicle accident occurred due to a defective tire retread, resulting in severe injuries to the occupants. One plaintiff sustained an arm amputation, and an infant involved in the incident suffered the loss of a leg. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging that the defective tire component caused the collision and their resulting injuries. During the proceedings, the plaintiffs presented testimony from numerous experts, including specialists in accident reconstruction, economics, vocational counseling, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedic surgery, and prosthetics. These experts likely provided evidence concerning the incident's cause, the extent of the plaintiffs' injuries, and the associated damages. The case concluded with an award of $11,700,000 to the plaintiffs, reflecting the severity of the injuries and the evidence presented.

A collision involving a tractor-trailer resulted in a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged the incident caused significant injuries, seeking damages for medical expenses, rehabilitation needs, and economic losses. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from specialists in truck accident investigation and reconstruction, rehabilitation nursing, life care planning, physical medicine and rehabilitation (focusing on brain and spinal cord injuries), and forensic economics. The defendant countered with experts in neuropsychology, orthopedic surgery, trucking operations, and forensic economics, likely disputing the extent of injuries, causation, or the valuation of damages. The case concluded with an award of $15,579,429 to the plaintiff. The substantial award suggests the court or jury found the defendant liable for the collision and determined the plaintiff sustained extensive and costly injuries as a result.

A legal dispute arose following a motor vehicle accident involving a tractor-trailer and a pickup truck. The plaintiff alleged damages and presented expert testimony in fields such as truck accident investigation, neuropsychology, rehabilitation nursing, and forensic economics. The defendant countered these claims with their own experts, who specialized in areas including accident reconstruction, injury biomechanics, transportation safety, and human factors analysis. The case concluded on June 3, 2019, when the parties reached a settlement agreement.