Pharr, Texas Jury Awards $40,000 in Rear-End Collision
A driver was rear-ended by another vehicle on Highway 281 in Pharr. The injured driver claimed head, neck, and lower back injuries. The case involved a claim for underinsured motorist benefits against his own insurance company after the at-fault driver's policy limits were exhausted. The defense argued that the injured driver's knee problems were not related to the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $40,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On November 12, 2013, a construction worker driving a pickup truck southbound on Highway 281 in Pharr, Texas, was rear-ended by a sedan. The plaintiff sustained head, neck, and lower back injuries. After settling with the sedan driver for the $30,000 policy limit, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against State Farm, seeking underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits. The plaintiff alleged the sedan driver was negligent by failing to control speed, which a police report noted as a contributing factor.
The plaintiff claimed the accident caused multiple disc herniations in the cervical and lumbar spine, cervical radiculopathy, and knee conditions including osteoarthritis, suprapatellar bursitis, swelling, and cellulitis. Medical evaluations included physical therapy, MRIs, and an electromyogram. A radiologist testified for the plaintiff regarding imaging findings. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, mental anguish, loss of earning capacity, and physical impairment.
State Farm disputed liability, noting the investigating officer did not determine negligence. The defense argued the plaintiff's knee issues were pre-existing and related to age and occupation, not the collision. They also questioned the severity of injuries, highlighting that the plaintiff did not miss work and was earning more post-accident. Defense counsel pointed to plaintiff's expert acknowledging that osteoarthritis and bursitis are not typically accident-caused, and that the expert and the orthopedic surgeon primarily treated patients involved in litigation. The defense also challenged the cost of certain medical procedures.
After a two-day trial, the jury found the sedan driver negligent and awarded the plaintiff $40,000 in damages. Following credits for the initial liability settlement and personal injury protection benefits, State Farm's net liability was $5,000.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.