Pecos Jury Awards $210,350 in DWI Parking Lot Collision
A parked car was struck by a pickup truck driven by an unlicensed driver. The driver fled the scene but was later apprehended. The owner of the pickup truck was also sued for negligence in hiring and supervising the driver. The case involved claims of negligence and gross negligence against both the driver and the company.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $210,350
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In February 2017, the plaintiff's Chevrolet Camaro was struck by a pickup truck in a hotel parking lot in Pecos, Texas. The driver of the truck, who was unlicensed and later arrested for driving while intoxicated after fleeing the scene, was at the hotel for business on behalf of his employer, American Tank Co., which owned the vehicle. The Camaro sustained damage, prompting the plaintiff to seek repairs.
The plaintiff and her daughter initially sued the driver and American Tank Co., alleging negligence and gross negligence in the operation of the vehicle and in the company's hiring, retention, management, and supervision of the driver. The daughter's claim was later dropped. The driver did not attend the trial but had previously invoked Fifth Amendment rights during deposition, though he claimed a co-worker had given him the keys to return the truck.
American Tank Co. did not dispute the driver's negligence but denied gross negligence and direct negligence against the company, asserting the driver was not authorized to use the vehicle. The company acknowledged awareness of the driver's prior DWI conviction but argued it was irrelevant because he was not hired as a driver. However, the company owner inadvertently disclosed the prior DWI during trial despite a court ruling, and evidence showed the company did not reprimand the driver.
Following a two-day trial, the jury found both defendants negligent and grossly negligent. The jury assigned 70 percent comparative responsibility to American Tank Co. and 30 percent to the driver. The plaintiff was awarded $210,350, including $10,000 for repair costs, $4,500 for diminution in value, $9,000 for loss of use, $6,500 for towing, $350 for storage, and punitive damages of $80,000 against American Tank Co. and $100,000 against the driver.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.