Palm Beach County Product Liability Settles After Tire Defect

A pedestrian filed a personal injury lawsuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, following a motor vehicle accident on June 6, 2013. The incident occurred in a parking lot when a tractor-trailer, operated by a defendant driver employed by a defendant trucking company, reversed and collided with the pedestrian. The truck was owned by the defendant company. The complaint alleged that the driver’s negligence caused the incident and the plaintiff’s permanent injuries. The plaintiff sought damages for bodily injury, pain and suffering, disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, lost wages and earning capacity, and medical expenses, including the aggravation of pre-existing conditions. The lawsuit also claimed the defendant company was vicariously liable for its employee's actions. An expert in trucking industry safety was identified by the plaintiff in the case.

On March 18, 2015, a motor vehicle accident occurred in Palm Beach County, Florida. The plaintiff later filed a lawsuit on February 6, 2018, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, alleging the defendant's negligent driving caused the incident and resulted in bodily injury, pain and suffering, lost earnings, and medical expenses. The defendant responded by arguing the plaintiff was comparatively negligent, failed to mitigate damages, and that a third party was responsible for the accident. Both sides presented expert testimony; the plaintiff offered a physical medicine and life care planning expert, while the defendant utilized experts in diagnostic radiology, orthopedic spinal surgery, and injury biomechanics. On June 21, 2019, a jury found in favor of the defendant. The court subsequently entered a final judgment on June 25, 2019, affirming the jury's verdict.

A motor vehicle accident occurred, which reportedly resulted in a plaintiff sustaining significant, permanent bodily injuries. The subsequent legal case involved expert witnesses for both sides, specializing in areas such as orthopedic surgery, diagnostic radiology, neurological surgery, accident reconstruction, automotive engineering, and medical coding. Further details regarding the specific allegations, arguments presented, or the final resolution of the case were not available in the record.

A personal injury lawsuit was filed following a motor vehicle accident caused by a driver under the influence of alcohol. The plaintiff sought damages related to injuries sustained in the incident. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented testimony from an expert in economics, with an affiliation in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, who discussed medical care costs and forensic economics. The defendant offered testimony from a neurological surgeon, with affiliations in West Palm Beach, Florida, to address the plaintiff's claimed injuries. After hearing the arguments and evidence, the jury returned a verdict awarding $0 to the plaintiff.

A motor vehicle collision occurred on April 28, 2009, at the intersection of Hiatus Road and Northwest 50th Street in Sunrise, Florida. The incident involved a vehicle operated by the plaintiff and another vehicle operated by a defendant employee, who was driving a company-owned vehicle for the defendant employer. Both parties disputed fault, each alleging the other's negligence. The plaintiff filed a negligence complaint on July 23, 2009, in the Florida Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County. The plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries, pain and suffering, and lost wages. A jury trial in May 2010 resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff on May 5, 2010, awarding $29,700. This amount included $12,000 for past and future medical expenses, $2,700 for past and future lost earnings, and $15,000 for past and future pain and suffering. The plaintiff's subsequent motion for a new trial or additur was denied by the court. The plaintiff appealed the judgment. On March 13, 2013, the Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded the case for a new trial. Following the remand, the parties settled the case at mediation on May 11, 2016, and the case was dismissed on June 28, 2016.