Oldham County Jury Awards $38,978,670 in Multi-Vehicle Crash
A multi-vehicle collision occurred on Interstate 40 on a dark, icy night. One truck lost control and blocked lanes. Another truck stopped on the shoulder and its driver exited. Subsequent impacts caused one vehicle to be pushed into the stopped truck, resulting in fatalities and serious injuries. The case involved claims of negligence against multiple drivers and trucking companies.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $38,978,670
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On the night of November 22, 2013, an icy Interstate 40 in Oldham County, Texas, was the scene of a multi-vehicle crash involving several tractor-trailers, a van, and a car. A tractor-trailer driver, operating for a trucking company, lost control of the vehicle, causing it to block eastbound lanes. Subsequent collisions occurred when a van and a car struck the disabled truck after slowing. Another tractor-trailer then struck the van and car. The van was pushed into the driver of a second tractor-trailer, who had pulled over to the shoulder and exited his vehicle, resulting in his death. A van passenger also died at the scene, and another van passenger died nine days later from injuries. The van driver suffered a leg amputation, and other occupants sustained various injuries.
Families of the deceased and injured individuals initiated a lawsuit, primarily alleging negligence and gross negligence against the tractor-trailer driver who first lost control and her employer. Plaintiffs contended the driver was negligent for failing to control her vehicle, speeding, and failing to take emergency measures, while the employer was negligent in entrusting the vehicle and in training. The defendants denied negligence, attributing the incident to black ice and alleging comparative negligence by other drivers, including the van driver and the deceased tractor-trailer driver.
After a 12-day trial and four days of jury deliberation, a jury found the defendants liable. The jury assigned 55 percent of comparative responsibility to the initial tractor-trailer driver, 30 percent to her employer, and 15 percent to the driver of the third tractor-trailer involved. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $38,978,670. The initial tractor-trailer driver and her employer were held jointly and severally liable for 100 percent of the damages, with the driver's responsibility attributed to her employer. The jury did not address the claims of gross negligence.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.