Marshall Commercial Truck Collision Settles for $1,000,000
One driver was traveling southbound when another driver in a tractor-trailer changed lanes and collided with their vehicle. The first vehicle left the road and flipped over. The injured person sustained broken ribs and a lacerated spleen. Medical bills totaled about $52,000.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $1,000,000
- County
- Harrison County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Chest / Rib Injury
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Spleen, Laceration, Fracture
Case Overview
On May 25, 2013, a 75-year-old plaintiff was driving a sedan in Marshall when a tractor-trailer, operated by a defendant driver for a defendant company, changed lanes and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The impact caused the plaintiff's vehicle to leave the road and flip. The plaintiff sustained five broken ribs, a small hemothorax, and minimal atelectasis. A CT scan revealed a lacerated spleen, which doctors noted might have been pre-existing. Following hospitalization, three weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, and continued home physical therapy, the plaintiff sought chiropractic and pain management care for ongoing neck, shoulder, back, and leg pain, incurring approximately $52,000 in medical bills.
The plaintiff sued the defendant driver for an unsafe lane change and the defendant company for negligent hiring and training. The defense denied the claims, arguing that the plaintiff, not the defendant driver, was responsible for the collision. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that the plaintiff's rib fractures had healed. The expert also asserted that other reported pain stemmed from age-related degenerative conditions and that a nerve block procedure was neither reasonable nor necessary.
After extensive discovery, including depositions, the case settled for $1,000,000. This amount represented the policy limit and was tendered in response to a Stowers demand.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harrison County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.