Kilgore Jury Awards $5,224 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The driver who caused the collision admitted fault for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $5,224
- County
- Gregg County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In January 2018, a plaintiff's compact car was rear-ended by another vehicle in Kilgore. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered injuries to the back, neck, and a shoulder in the collision. An ambulance transported the plaintiff to an emergency room, where X-rays were unremarkable, and pain medication was prescribed before release. The plaintiff later sought follow-up care and was placed on light duty for several weeks before reporting significantly reduced pain levels.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence in the operation of the vehicle. The defendant stipulated to liability for the accident. During the proceedings, it was noted that the defendant initially left the scene but later reported the incident to a police station approximately 20 minutes after the collision. The plaintiff sought $4,724 for past medical expenses, along with $9,000 for past physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. The defense argued that any injuries sustained were minor, resolved quickly, required minimal treatment, and resulted from a low-impact collision.
After a one-day trial, a jury deliberated for 30 minutes before returning a verdict. The jury awarded the plaintiff $5,224. This amount included $4,724 for past medical costs and $500 for past physical pain and suffering. With prejudgment interest and taxable costs, the final judgment entered was $6,278.29. The jury's award primarily covered medical expenses, suggesting they found the non-economic damages to be less extensive than the plaintiff claimed.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Gregg County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.