Irving, Texas Jury Awards $24 Million in Fatal Dram Shop Crash
A driver lost control of a vehicle while speeding and under the influence of alcohol, causing it to roll over and catch fire. The passenger sustained fatal injuries. The passenger's estate sued the nightclub where the driver had been served alcohol, alleging negligence in serving alcohol to an intoxicated person. The defense argued the driver was not obviously intoxicated at the club and that the passenger was also negligent for not wearing a seatbelt.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $25,000,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Highway
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In December 2012, a football player, who was a recent addition to a professional team's practice squad, sustained fatal injuries in a high-speed car accident in Irving, Texas. The incident occurred shortly after midnight when the player left Beamers Private Club, a Dallas nightclub, as a passenger in a sedan driven by his roommate, who was also a professional football player. Minutes later, the driver-defendant lost control of the vehicle on State Highway 114, causing it to roll over and catch fire. A blood test revealed the driver-defendant's blood alcohol concentration was 0.189, more than twice the legal limit. He was later sentenced to six months in jail and 10 years' probation for driving while intoxicated.
The decedent's mother, acting individually and as administrator of his estate, filed a lawsuit against the club and its manager, alleging negligent service of alcohol to the driver-defendant. The suit also named the driver-defendant, claiming he was negligent in operating his vehicle. Other entities initially named in the lawsuit were later dismissed, and the decedent's father's consolidated claims were nonsuited. The club and its manager had filed for bankruptcy after the lawsuit began, and they were uninsured.
During the trial, the plaintiffs' counsel argued that the club-defendants' staff failed to follow written policies regarding alcohol service and allowed the driver-defendant to serve himself bottles of alcohol, leading to overconsumption. Cell phone videos allegedly showed the driver-defendant drinking from a bottle, and a toxicology expert opined that he would have needed 17 drinks to reach his blood alcohol concentration. The plaintiffs' counsel suggested the jury assign 85 percent responsibility to the club-defendants and 15 percent to the driver-defendant. In response, the club-defendants denied the driver-defendant was visibly intoxicated and contended that most of his alcohol consumption occurred before arriving at the club. They argued that if the driver-defendant was visibly intoxicated, the decedent was negligent for entering the vehicle with him and for not wearing a seat belt. The club-defendants' counsel suggested a different apportionment of fault, placing 95 percent responsibility on the driver-defendant and 5 percent on the decedent. The driver-defendant testified he did not drink before the club and disputed drinking from a bottle at the club.
After a six-day trial and five hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, finding comparative negligence. The jury assigned 48 percent responsibility to the club and its manager, 48 percent to the driver-defendant, and 4 percent to the decedent. The jury did not find gross negligence. Total damages were awarded at $25,000,000, which was reduced to $24,000,000 due to the decedent's comparative responsibility.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
In Dallas County, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit after experiencing neck and back injuries in a rear-end collision. The plaintiff alleged the defendant's negligence caused the incident and sought damages for physical pain, impairment, and medical expenses. Prior to trial, the parties engaged in mediation, but the case proceeded to a jury. During the trial, the plaintiff presented testimony from an orthopedic medical expert regarding the injuries sustained. The defendant did not present any expert testimony. The jury ultimately returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded total damages of $7,131. This amount included $1,000 for past physical pain and suffering, $2,000 for past physical impairment, and $4,131 for past medical care. The jury awarded no damages for future pain and suffering, future physical impairment, or past and future mental anguish.
A civil case involving a plaintiff, who also acted as next friend for a second individual, and a defendant concluded in Texas on April 30, 2015. Few details were available regarding the specific incident that led to the lawsuit, the legal claims presented by either side, or the ultimate resolution of the dispute.
One driver was slowing for a stop light when the other driver, who was trying to retrieve a dropped cell phone, rear-ended their vehicle. The injured driver sustained a neck injury, a bulging disc, and neck pain. They also incurred medical expenses, lost wages, and vehicle damage.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.