Houston Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Dram Shop Collision
One driver was heading north on a freeway when a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction struck them head on. The occupants of the first vehicle sustained multiple injuries. The driver of the second vehicle was allegedly intoxicated and driving the wrong way. The case involved claims against the other driver and a bar for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person. The jury found the bar not negligent but awarded damages against the driver who had previously settled.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1,442,500
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Head-on
- Case Type
- Fracture, Shoulder, Hand
Case Overview
In November 2012, a head-on collision occurred on the Gulf Freeway in Houston when a vehicle driving the wrong way struck another car. The occupants of the struck vehicle, a driver and two passengers, sustained multiple injuries, including fractures, internal injuries, a ruptured spleen, and soft tissue damage. The driver, a firefighter, was hospitalized for months and underwent several operations. The passengers also received significant medical treatment.
The injured parties initially sued the wrong-way driver, alleging intoxication and negligence. That driver, who was left in a permanent vegetative state, settled for a confidential amount more than six months before trial. The plaintiffs then added Montrose Business Interests, operating as Bayou City Bar & Grill, to the lawsuit, alleging violations of the Texas Dram Shop Act. They claimed the bar served the wrong-way driver when he was obviously intoxicated, posing a clear danger to himself and others. Plaintiffs' witnesses testified the driver consumed numerous drinks, slurred his speech, fell, fought, and was ejected from the bar shortly before the accident. Toxicology and dram shop experts for the plaintiffs opined the driver's blood alcohol content was high and his intoxication would have been obvious to bartenders.
Montrose Business Interests denied negligence and disputed serving the driver while he was obviously intoxicated. The defendant argued that witnesses did not testify to obvious intoxication at the specific times of service, that the driver was ejected earlier than claimed, and may have consumed alcohol at other nearby establishments. The defense also raised a "safe harbor" provision of the Dram Shop Act, which protects alcohol providers if bartenders attend a training program, though plaintiffs questioned compliance.
Following a two-week trial in Houston, the jury found Montrose Business Interests was not negligent. The jury did find the wrong-way driver negligent and awarded the plaintiffs $1,442,500 in damages for past medical costs, pain, impairment, and mental anguish. However, because the wrong-way driver had settled prior to trial, the plaintiffs collected no additional damages from him based on the verdict, and received no damages from Montrose Business Interests.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.
On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.
On March 13, 2012, a plaintiff was injured in a multi-vehicle collision while driving in slow traffic near Highway 59 in Houston, Texas. The defendant driver reportedly swerved into the plaintiff's lane, striking a vehicle behind the plaintiff, which then collided with the rear of the plaintiff's slowing car. The plaintiff subsequently filed a vehicular negligence action. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, operating a vehicle unsafely, and failing to apply brakes in a timely manner, which led to injuries including to the chest, neck, back, and a partial to full thickness tear of the right rotator cuff. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury. Following the proceedings, the court found the defendant negligent and that this negligence caused harm to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $10,000 for past pain and suffering, $10,000 for past disfigurement, and $10,003 for past medical expenses, totaling $30,003.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.