Houston Jury Finds Split Fault in Red-Light Collision, Awards $38,290.13
One driver was traveling south on a street in Houston and another driver was traveling east. Both drivers entered an intersection without stopping, and the two vehicles collided. One vehicle then struck a building. The driver who ran the red light was cited. The plaintiffs claimed multiple injuries from the collision.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $38,290
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 24, 2015, a collision occurred at the intersection of Dowling Street (now Emancipation Avenue) and Polk Street in Houston. A plaintiff driver was traveling south with a plaintiff passenger when their vehicle entered the intersection without stopping. Simultaneously, a defendant driver, traveling east, also entered the signal-controlled intersection without stopping. The defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' right front fender, causing the plaintiffs' vehicle to collide with a nearby building. The defendant driver received a citation for running a red light.
The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for running a red light, failing to yield the right of way, and failing to maintain a proper lookout. The plaintiff driver claimed multiple injuries, including cervical neck and back strains, disc protrusions, and a herniated lumbar disc, seeking compensation for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The plaintiff passenger also sought damages for medical expenses and discomfort.
During the trial, the plaintiff driver testified that her traffic light was green. The defendant driver testified that the sun was in her eyes and she was unsure of the light's color. The defense suggested the plaintiff driver was speeding, a possibility the plaintiff driver acknowledged. The defense also contested the extent and cost of the plaintiff driver's injuries, arguing they were soft-tissue injuries that should have resolved quickly and noting a lack of recent treatment.
A Houston jury found both parties negligent, assigning 85 percent of the fault to the defendant driver and 15 percent to the plaintiff driver. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $38,290.13. After applying comparative fault, the defendant was held liable for 85 percent of the plaintiff driver's damages and 100 percent of the plaintiff passenger's damages, resulting in a total liability of $33,295.15.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.