Houston Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $3,456 in Rear-End Crash
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, which then rear-ended the vehicle in front of it. The driver who initiated the chain reaction was accused of failing to maintain a proper lookout, control her speed, and running a red light. The defense argued the wreck was an accident and denied negligence. The injured driver claimed neck, lower back, and shoulder injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,456
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On November 10, 2016, a multi-vehicle collision occurred in Houston, Texas, where a sedan rear-ended a van, which then rear-ended a pickup truck driven by an 18-year-old student. The plaintiff, the pickup truck driver, claimed injuries and sued the sedan's driver for negligence, alleging failure to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and running a red light.
The plaintiff and the van driver testified they were proceeding through a green light when the collision occurred, with plaintiff's counsel arguing the defendant was inattentive and ran a red light. The defendant denied negligence, testifying all three vehicles were stopped at a red light and she struck the van when it suddenly stopped after the light changed. The defense suggested the van may have hit the plaintiff's truck first. The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and shoulder sprains, undergoing chiropractic treatment.
The defense challenged the plaintiff's injuries, citing delayed treatment, sole reliance on chiropractic care, and inconsistent symptom reporting. After a two-day trial, a Houston jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $3,456, comprising $3,455 for past medical costs and $1 for past physical pain.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.