Houston Jury Finds Liability in Rear-End Collision, Awards $3,006
One driver stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended her. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to her neck, back, and shoulder. She sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The other driver admitted fault but disputed the extent of the claimed injuries. The jury found the defendant liable and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,006
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In December 2017, a plaintiff driver and her young son were involved in a rear-end collision on Murphy Road in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff driver had stopped in traffic when her vehicle was struck from behind by a sedan operated by the defendant driver. The plaintiff driver alleged she sustained neck, back, and shoulder injuries, including herniated discs and sprains, which led to ongoing pain and treatment. Her son received emergency room evaluation shortly after the incident, with no further treatment.
The plaintiff driver, on behalf of herself and her son, filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant driver was negligent in operating the vehicle. The defendant driver admitted fault for the collision but denied negligence, arguing he was not distracted, speeding, or using a cell phone, and that he applied his brakes upon seeing the plaintiff's vehicle stop. The defense also disputed the causation and extent of the plaintiff's claimed injuries, noting the impact was minor, no police or ambulance responded to the scene, and the plaintiff acknowledged pre-existing damage to her vehicle's rear. The plaintiffs sought over $90,000 in past medical expenses and pain and suffering for both individuals.
Following a one-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant driver liable for the accident. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $3,006. The significantly lower award compared to the damages sought suggested the jury did not fully attribute the claimed injuries to the collision or agreed with the defense regarding the minor nature of the impact.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.