Houston Jury Awards $9,765 After Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind in a three-car collision. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The case proceeded against one of the drivers who allegedly caused the rear-end impact. The defense argued the impact was minor and the injuries were pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $9,765
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On January 29, 2016, a three-vehicle rear-impact collision occurred on Fairbanks North Houston Road in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff was stopped at a red light when the incident took place. Police responded to the scene but did not issue any citations or create a report. The plaintiff later reported neck and back injuries, along with headaches, and sought medical attention following the crash.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the driver of the rearmost vehicle, alleging negligence. After that defendant claimed the driver of the middle vehicle caused the accident, the plaintiff added the middle driver as a co-defendant. The plaintiff subsequently settled with the co-defendant for a confidential amount prior to trial. The case proceeded against the original defendant. The plaintiff argued that the co-defendant's vehicle had stopped behind the plaintiff's car, and the defendant's vehicle then struck the co-defendant's, pushing it into the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, or brake effectively. The defense contended that the co-defendant's vehicle had either already struck the plaintiff's car or stopped abruptly before the defendant's impact, characterizing the collision as a minor "tap" in stop-and-go traffic.
The plaintiff sought $9,765 for past medical expenses, claiming cervical disc protrusions, sprains, strains, and headaches. An ambulance had been called to the scene, but no one was transported. The defense argued that the minor nature of the impact could not have caused the claimed injuries and noted the plaintiff's pre-existing history of diabetes-related neck pain, suggesting the accident was used as an opportunity for additional treatment. Following a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for 90 minutes. The jury found the defendant solely negligent and the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries, awarding the plaintiff $9,765.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.