Houston Jury Awards $75,000 in Negligent Rear-End Collision
One driver was turning left into a driveway when the other driver struck the rear of her vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back and neck. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $75,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On September 30, 2015, the plaintiff's car was struck from behind by a pickup truck driven by the defendant on Antoine Street in Houston. The incident occurred as the plaintiff was turning left into a driveway. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant's negligent operation of the vehicle caused her neck and back injuries. A police report noted possible contributing factors for the defendant, including cell phone use and failing to control speed. The defense later conceded liability.
The plaintiff sought emergency room treatment the following day for headaches and neck and back pain, receiving a diagnosis of sprains and strains. She underwent four chiropractic sessions in October 2015, with X-rays showing cervical and lumbar hypolordosis. After an 11-month treatment gap, she resumed therapy in August 2016. MRIs in September 2016 revealed disc protrusions/herniations in the cervical and lumbar spine. At trial, the plaintiff claimed ongoing pain requiring future medical care, seeking significant damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, and impairment.
A defense expert, a chiropractor, testified that the disc herniations were not caused by the accident, attributing only mild, short-term sprains and strains to the collision. The expert asserted that only the initial emergency room visit and first four therapy sessions were reasonable and necessary. Defense counsel emphasized the substantial gap in the plaintiff's treatment and that she did not miss work. The defense proposed considerably lower compensation for past medical expenses, pain, and impairment, suggesting zero for other damages.
Following a two-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before finding the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $75,000 in total damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.