Houston Jury Awards $7,000 in Multiple Rear-End Collisions
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by another vehicle. Later, the same driver stopped at another red light and was again rear-ended by a different vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries from both accidents, including shoulder bursitis and herniated discs, which he argued were aggravations of pre-existing conditions. The defense argued that the impacts were minor and the injuries were pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In Houston, Texas, a disabled driver was involved in two separate rear-end collisions in late 2013, leading to a lawsuit against the two other drivers. The plaintiff alleged the first incident occurred on September 19, 2013, when a defendant driver rear-ended his stopped vehicle on Long Point Road. The second incident took place on December 4, 2013, when a different defendant driver rear-ended his vehicle on Eldridge Road. The plaintiff, whose wife was a passenger in both accidents, claimed both incidents caused or aggravated pre-existing conditions including right shoulder bursitis and herniated discs, arguing the defendants were liable for aggravating his "easily injured" state.
The plaintiff sued both drivers, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout and control their speed. One defendant acknowledged her foot slipped off the brake due to an ambulance, causing a low-speed impact, but disputed the extent of damages. That defendant's counsel argued the plaintiff's prior medical records, including treatment for neck pain two months before the first accident, contradicted his claim of being asymptomatic. The other defendant disputed negligence, stating a sneeze caused her foot to slip and resulted in a low-speed collision. Both defendants presented an orthopedic surgeon expert who opined the accidents only caused whiplash and that most of the plaintiff's post-accident treatment was unnecessary. Vehicle photos presented by the defense showed minimal damage, although the plaintiff's counsel suggested they were taken after repairs.
A jury found both defendants negligent and that their negligence proximately caused their respective accidents. The jury awarded the plaintiff $7,000, which corresponded to the past medical expenses suggested by the defense for each accident. This amount was significantly less than the $275,000 to $300,000 sought by the plaintiff. The outcome suggested the jury largely sided with the defense regarding the extent of injuries attributable to the collisions, likely influenced by arguments about the minor nature of the impacts and the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions. The plaintiff plans to appeal the judgment.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.