Houston Jury Awards $640,000 in Fatal Intersection Collision
One driver was traveling northbound and the other was traveling eastbound at an intersection. The northbound vehicle broadsided the eastbound vehicle. The driver of the northbound vehicle sustained fatal injuries, including a ruptured spleen and internal bleeding. The case involved allegations of running a red light and failure to keep a proper lookout.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $640,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In July 2010, a two-vehicle collision occurred at an intersection on Wilcrest Drive in Houston, Texas, resulting in the death of a 66-year-old retired passenger. The decedent was traveling northbound in a minivan when it broadsided an eastbound sedan. The passenger sustained fatal internal injuries and died en route to the hospital.
The decedent’s two adult sons, on behalf of themselves and the estate, filed a negligence lawsuit against the sedan’s driver and the minivan’s driver. They alleged the sedan driver ran a red light, failed to maintain a proper lookout, and failed to control speed. Alternatively, they alleged negligence on the part of the minivan driver, who later settled with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount before trial.
During the trial, the plaintiffs presented an accident reconstruction expert who testified about the intersection’s stoplight sequence, asserting the sedan’s green light was brief and vehicle-activated. The plaintiffs argued that if the sedan driver had seen the light turn green from a distance, it would have turned red before she reached the intersection. The defense, however, maintained that the sedan driver’s light was green and the minivan driver's was red. An independent eyewitness initially told authorities the minivan ran a red light, but later testified she could not see the light's color, a change the defense attributed to subsequent contact with the plaintiffs. The court allowed the witness's changed testimony but excluded her prior statements.
The jury ultimately found both drivers negligent. The sedan driver was assigned 80 percent of the responsibility, and the minivan driver 20 percent. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $640,000, which included damages for the estate's funeral expenses, the decedent's pain and anguish, and the sons' loss of companionship and mental anguish. Due to Texas's comparative responsibility laws, the sedan driver, being more than 50 percent responsible, was held liable for the entire award. The sedan driver appealed the judgment.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.