Houston Jury Awards $595,000 in Locomotive Accident
One worker was inspecting a train when it unexpectedly moved. The worker tried to stop it, but a device malfunctioned, causing the train to hit a wall. The worker sustained injuries to their back, spine, arm, and shoulder, requiring surgeries and making them unable to return to their job. The worker sued the railroad company, alleging violations of safety laws and failure to provide a safe workplace. The railroad company admitted negligence caused the train incident but denied responsibility for the worker's injuries, claiming the worker's own negligence and pre-existing conditions contributed.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $472,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
On March 3, 2015, a machinist employed by a railroad company was inspecting a locomotive consist at Settegast Yard in Houston, Texas, when the consist unexpectedly moved. An emergency derail device malfunctioned, causing the consist to enter the Roundhouse and collide, leading the plaintiff to strike a locomotive wall. Post-incident analysis revealed an unrepaired electrical malfunction in one of the locomotives caused the accident. The plaintiff sustained injuries to the back, spine, arm, shoulder, and rotator cuff, requiring multiple surgical procedures and rendering them unable to return to their railroad occupation.
The plaintiff filed a complaint against the railroad company on February 9, 2018, alleging violations of the Locomotive Inspection Act and a failure to provide a reasonably safe workplace. The plaintiff sought compensation for past and future physical pain, suffering, disfigurement, bodily impairment, disability, mental and emotional suffering, lost wages and earning capacity, medical expenses, and household services. The defendant admitted negligence caused the train's movement but denied responsibility for the plaintiff's injuries, asserting the plaintiff's own negligence, pre-existing conditions, failure to mitigate damages, and that a subsequent termination for a positive drug test result impacted earning capacity.
On October 29, 2020, a jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding total damages of $595,000. This included compensation for past and future lost earning capacity, past physical pain, past mental anguish, and past and future physical impairment. The court also awarded the plaintiff $50,000 in attorneys' fees and costs. On January 11, 2021, the plaintiff's claims against the railroad company were dismissed with prejudice, indicating a likely settlement was reached following the jury verdict.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.