Houston Jury Awards $44,800 in Comparative Negligence Collision
One driver was changing lanes when their vehicle collided with a pickup truck. The occupants of the sedan claimed injuries including neck, back, and head issues, with some alleging disc protrusions and traumatic brain injury. The defense argued the sedan driver caused the collision and that injuries were exaggerated or pre-existing. The jury found comparative negligence on both sides.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $52,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On February 12, 2015, a collision occurred on U.S. 59 near Spur 527 in Houston, Texas. A sedan, driven by a plaintiff and carrying two plaintiff passengers, was changing lanes when its right rear corner collided with a pickup truck. The truck's driver was an employee of Tower One International LLLP, acting within the scope of his employment. The sedan occupants subsequently sued the truck driver for negligent operation of his vehicle and his employer for negligent entrustment, citing the driver's prior moving violations.
The plaintiffs argued their vehicle was well into the lane when the truck struck them, contending the right lane was clear when the lane change began. They claimed various injuries, including disc protrusions, a mild traumatic brain injury for one passenger, and associated pain. Their counsel sought substantial damages for medical expenses, pain, and impairment, supported by chiropractic and neurology experts. The defense countered that the plaintiff driver caused the collision by moving into the truck's lane. They disputed the severity and origin of the alleged injuries, with a defense chiropractor testifying that claims were exaggerated, treatment was excessive, and injuries were minor soft-tissue or pre-existing.
After a three-day trial, the jury found both drivers negligent. The defendant driver was assigned 55 percent comparative responsibility for the collision, and the plaintiff driver was assigned 45 percent. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $52,000. After reducing the plaintiff driver's individual award due to her comparative negligence, the net damages awarded to all plaintiffs totaled $44,800.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.