Houston Jury Awards $416,527 in Underinsured Motorist Claim
A driver was stopped at a red light when another car hit her SUV. The other driver left the scene before police arrived. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back and neck, including disc issues and pain in her arms and legs. She underwent chiropractic treatment and was recommended for surgery. The case went to trial for damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $416,528
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In December 2014, a plaintiff was driving a sport utility vehicle on a one-way street in Houston when another compact car, traveling in an adjacent lane, entered the plaintiff's lane after a red light turned green and collided with the SUV. The driver of the compact car left the scene before police arrived. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered back and neck injuries from the collision and initially settled with the at-fault driver for their $30,000 liability policy limit.
The plaintiff then sued their own insurer, seeking underinsured motorist benefits under a $50,000 policy. The lawsuit alleged negligence by the other driver in operating their vehicle. The defendant insurer conceded liability, and the trial proceeded solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained multiple intervertebral disc protrusions and/or herniations in the cervical and lumbar spine, along with associated pain, numbness, and tingling. Evidence presented included chiropractic and physical therapy treatments, a recommended lumbar surgery that had not been performed by the time of trial, and an epidural steroid injection.
During the one-day trial, the plaintiff's counsel sought significant damages for past and future medical expenses, as well as pain, anguish, and impairment. The defense emphasized the plaintiff's age and the fact that the recommended surgery had not been undertaken years after the incident. After 1.5 hours of deliberation, a jury awarded the plaintiff $416,527.72. This amount was reduced by the $30,000 already received from the at-fault driver's policy and further limited to the plaintiff's $50,000 underinsured motorist policy limit.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.