Houston Jury Awards $2,250 in Collision with Split Liability
One driver was operating a bus when the other driver merged into the intersection and struck the bus. The bus driver stated the other driver was negligent. The other driver claimed the bus driver violated their right-of-way. The collision caused injuries to the bus driver's neck and spine, requiring surgery. The jury found the second driver mostly at fault for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Auto/Bus Collision
Case Overview
On October 2, 2012, a 51-year-old bus driver was operating a bus westbound on Old Katy Highway in Houston, Texas, when it was struck on the driver's side by another vehicle pulling out of an intersecting road. The plaintiff alleged the impact caused a sudden movement, resulting in a "pop" sensation in his lower neck and shoulder area. He later claimed injuries including a labral tear requiring arthroscopic surgery and disc injuries to the cervical spine.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent by failing to pay attention, yield the right-of-way, maintain a proper lookout, and merge safely into traffic. The defendant denied these allegations, asserting that the plaintiff violated the defendant's right-of-way, which caused the collision. The defendant further contended that the plaintiff's ongoing cervical condition was degenerative and not related to the accident.
Following a trial, a jury determined the defendant was 75% liable for the accident and the plaintiff was 25% liable. The jury awarded the plaintiff $2,000 for past mental anguish and $1,000 for past physical impairment, totaling $3,000. This award was subsequently reduced to $2,250 to account for the plaintiff's comparative negligence.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A plaintiff filed a vehicular negligence action after his stopped vehicle was struck from the rear by a defendant's vehicle on April 10, 2014, at an intersection in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control the vehicle, maintain a proper lookout, and take evasive action. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained an ankle sprain and discogenic injuries to the cervical and lumbar spine as a result of the collision. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence, including that the plaintiff sustained serious or permanent injuries from the accident. A jury ultimately found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $16,361 for past damages and an additional $10,000 for future damages.
On August 14, 2014, a vehicular collision occurred in Houston, Texas, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendant, operating a company vehicle within the scope of employment, was traveling at an excessive rate of speed, failed to maintain a proper lookout, and did not keep a safe distance, causing severe injuries to the plaintiff's cervical and lumbar spine. The plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit, claiming the defendant's actions led to significant neck and back disc injuries. The defendant failed to answer the complaint, resulting in a default judgment entered by the court. The court awarded the plaintiff $364,305 in damages. This included $200,000 for pain and suffering, $14,305 for past medical expenses, and $150,000 for future medical expenses. The judgment was granted due to the defendant's failure to respond to the legal complaint.
In October 2011, a plaintiff was driving a compact car eastbound on Interstate 10 in Harris County, Texas. While moving to the outside shoulder to yield to an approaching fire truck, the plaintiff's vehicle struck a rectangular hole in the pavement, causing a right front tire blowout. The hole, approximately two feet long and several inches deep, had resulted from the removal of a traffic-counting device and had not been refilled. The plaintiff alleged a shoulder injury. The plaintiff filed a premises liability lawsuit against the Texas Department of Transportation, alleging the hole constituted an unreasonably dangerous "special defect" that the agency knew or should have known about. The court ruled that the hole was a special defect as a matter of law. The defendant denied knowledge of the condition and contended that the plaintiff was negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff claimed the incident aggravated a pre-existing partial rotator cuff tear, while the defense argued the injury was entirely pre-existing and noted a six-month gap in the plaintiff's treatment history. After a two-day trial, a jury found the Texas Department of Transportation negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,973. The jury's finding of negligence was based on the determination that the defendant "knew or should have known" of the dangerous condition. The jury did not find the defendant negligent based on "actual knowledge," nor did it find the plaintiff comparatively negligent. The award included damages for past medical costs, past physical impairment, past lost earning capacity, and past physical pain.
A civil case involving a plaintiff, who also acted as next friend for a second individual, and a defendant concluded in Texas on April 30, 2015. Few details were available regarding the specific incident that led to the lawsuit, the legal claims presented by either side, or the ultimate resolution of the dispute.
In Tarrant County, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence following a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained bodily injuries, specifically soft tissue damage to the neck and back, as a result of the incident. A jury heard the case and delivered an 11-1 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages totaling $2,226. This amount included $500 for past physical pain and mental anguish, and $1,726 for past medical care.