Houston Jury Awards $15,463 in Motor Vehicle Negligence
One driver failed to control their speed and struck the back of another vehicle. The injured driver sought compensation for pain, medical expenses, and lost earning capacity. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable and the injured driver was partially at fault. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $20,048
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
A vehicle collision occurred on September 29, 2015, on South Loop East in Houston, Texas, when the defendant reportedly struck the plaintiff's vehicle after failing to control a vehicle's speed. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit on June 27, 2016, alleging the defendant was negligent in several ways, including failing to maintain control, apply brakes, keep a proper lookout, and obey traffic laws. The plaintiff sought compensation for physical pain, medical expenses, mental anguish, loss of earning capacity, and physical impairment.
The defendant filed a general denial and asserted affirmative defenses, including contributory negligence and unavoidable accident. The case proceeded through discovery, with the court denying a no-evidence motion for partial summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, except for dismissing the defendant's defense of failure to mitigate. A subsequent motion for partial summary judgment from the plaintiff was also denied.
The case proceeded to trial, and on September 29, 2021, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff a total of $15,463.00. This amount included $10,877.21 for past medical care expenses, $3,280.00 in prejudgment interest, and $1,305.79 in court costs. The judgment also stipulated post-judgment interest at 0.50% until the full amount was paid.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.