Houston Jury Awards $11,421 in Red-Light Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when another vehicle ran the light and hit a third vehicle. The third vehicle then hit the first vehicle. The driver of the first vehicle claimed neck and back injuries and sought compensation for medical expenses and pain.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $11,421
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 4, 2015, a three-vehicle collision occurred in Houston. The plaintiff, a pet store employee, was driving a Chrysler Pacifica eastbound on Beechnut Street and had stopped at a red light at the West Sam Houston Parkway feeder road. After the light turned green, a defendant, driving a Toyota Camry on the feeder road, reportedly ran a red light. The Camry struck a Ford Crown Victoria, which then collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff claimed neck and back strains, sprains, and a 1-millimeter cervical disc herniation.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant negligently ran a red light and failed to yield the right of way. The plaintiff underwent two months of physical therapy and received pain medication. The plaintiff sought $11,421 for past medical expenses and $5,000 for past physical pain. On the day of trial, the defendant stipulated to liability, focusing the case on damages. The defense highlighted a two-day delay in the plaintiff seeking treatment and the plaintiff's denial of injury at the scene. Defense counsel suggested the jury award only reasonable medical bills and 10 percent of that amount for pain.
A jury awarded the plaintiff $11,421. This total included $10,121 for past medical costs and $1,300 for past physical pain. The award for past medical expenses matched the amount sought by the plaintiff, but the award for past physical pain was less than the requested amount.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.