Houston Jury Awards $1,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck, including herniated discs. The case went to trial, and the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On September 30, 2014, a deliveryman sustained injuries in a rear-end collision at an intersection on Airport Boulevard in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff's vehicle was struck by a sport utility vehicle driven by the defendant shortly after the traffic signal turned green. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent in operating the vehicle by failing to control speed and maintain a proper lookout.
The plaintiff claimed to have suffered herniations of the C5-6 and L4-5 intervertebral discs, seeking $40,000 for past and future medical expenses, as well as pain and impairment. The defendant contended the accident occurred because the plaintiff failed to proceed promptly at the green light. The defense also presented evidence that a police report from the scene indicated no injury to the plaintiff and classified the incident as a minor collision, a detail consistent with the plaintiff's initial hospital records.
After a two-day trial and 160 hours of jury deliberation, the jury found the defendant liable for the accident. However, the jury awarded the plaintiff $1,000 in damages. This award included $980 for past medical expenses and an additional $20 for past physical pain, a sum significantly less than the amount sought by the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.