Houston Judge Rules in Motor Vehicle Negligence, Awards $11,429
One driver was operating a vehicle when it was struck by another vehicle. The driver of the second vehicle alleged the first vehicle suddenly braked. The driver of the second vehicle was found to be at fault for the collision. The case resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $11,429
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 27, 2018, a motor vehicle owned by an insured individual was damaged in a collision with a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff insurer, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, compensated its insured for the loss and subsequently became subrogated for $11,429.25. On July 7, 2019, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence proximately caused the collision and resulting damages.
The defendant filed a general denial, asserting defenses including failure to mitigate damages, unavoidable accident, and sudden emergency. The defendant also filed a cross-claim against a third-party driver, alleging that driver's vehicle had suddenly braked, causing the collision. The third-party driver sought summary judgment, arguing a lack of evidence of their negligence and that a police report indicated the defendant's negligence was the sole cause, stating they had stopped for an emergency police vehicle. The defendant countered this with a passenger's declaration, which stated the vehicle in front suddenly braked. The defendant additionally filed a motion to designate the City of Houston as a responsible third party.
The case proceeded to trial, concluding with a consent judgment entered on October 1, 2021. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff insurer, awarding damages of $11,429.25, plus court costs and interest.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.