Houston Judge Awards $127,260 in Rear-End Collision Default
One driver stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended them. The first driver sued, alleging the second driver was negligent. The case involved multiple trial settings and sanctions against the defendant for failing to comply with court orders. A default judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $127,260
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2025
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
On June 10, 2015, a vehicle operated by the plaintiff was rear-ended while stopped at a red light at Bissonnet Street and Sam Houston Parkway in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit on June 2, 2017, alleging the defendant was negligent in the operation of their vehicle, including claims of failing to control speed, apply brakes, maintain a proper lookout, and obey Texas statutes regarding vehicle operation. The plaintiff sought compensation for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, medical expenses, loss of earnings, disfigurement, and physical impairment.
The case proceeded through the court system with several trial settings. On January 31, 2018, the defendant failed to attend a mandatory mediation session, prompting the plaintiff to file motions for sanctions and default judgment. The case was subsequently reset for trial multiple times.
The defendant later failed to appear for scheduled trial settings, including on March 13, 2019, and May 7, 2019. On May 7, 2019, the court sanctioned the defendant for failure to comply with court orders and entered a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The final judgment awarded the plaintiff total damages of $127,260.00. This amount included compensation for past and future medical expenses, past and future mental anguish, past and future loss of society, and loss of earning capacity.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.