Houston Court Awards $130,842 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended their pickup truck. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The defense argued the shoulder injury was pre-existing. The case was tried as a bench trial.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $130,842
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Shoulder Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A former cabinet finisher sustained injuries in a June 6, 2013, rear-end collision on Texas State Highway Beltway 8 near Houston. The plaintiff's stopped pickup truck was struck by a work van operated by an employee of Halco Mechanical Inc. The plaintiff sued the driver's estate and the employer for negligence; Halco Mechanical conceded liability for the incident at trial.
The plaintiff was diagnosed with a partial thickness tear of the right rotator cuff, and cervical and lumbar sprains. He underwent surgery, extensive physical therapy, and pain management, reporting lasting scarring. The plaintiff sought between $500,000 and $1 million in total damages, including over $100,000 for past medical and $200,000 for future medical expenses.
The central dispute at trial focused on the causation of the plaintiff's shoulder injury. The plaintiff's treating orthopedic surgeon testified the rotator cuff injury was causally related to the collision. However, the defense argued the injury was pre-existing and unrelated, presenting expert testimony based on the plaintiff's pre-accident medical records, which documented prior rotator cuff surgery.
The court awarded the plaintiff $130,842.29. This included $103,842 for past medical costs and $20,000 for future medical costs, plus amounts for past physical impairment, pain and suffering, and disfigurement. The award was significantly lower than the plaintiff's request for future medical and non-economic damages, reflecting the court's apparent consideration of the defense's argument regarding the pre-existing injury. Prejudgment interest and taxable costs were also added.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.