Verdictly
Settlement
Harris County • 2022

Harris County Rear-End Collision Settles for Minor's $400

One driver was entering a freeway ramp when her vehicle was struck from behind by two other vehicles. The driver sued the operators of the other vehicles and the owner of one of them, alleging negligence. The defendants raised various defenses, including comparative responsibility and contributory negligence. The court granted partial summary judgment for the owner on the negligent entrustment claim. The parties mediated and reached a settlement agreement, which was approved by the court. A small amount was awarded to a minor passenger.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$400
County
Harris County, TX
Resolved
2022

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Overview

A vehicle driven by the plaintiff, with a minor passenger, was involved in a rear-end collision on July 20, 2014, on the Gulf Freeway entrance ramp of Scott Street in Harris County, Texas. Their vehicle was struck by two other motor vehicles operated by the defendant drivers. The plaintiff later filed a lawsuit, alleging both defendant drivers failed to keep a proper lookout, maintain a reasonable distance, and apply brakes in a timely manner. The plaintiff also asserted a negligent entrustment claim against one defendant driver's spouse, who owned the vehicle. The plaintiffs sought damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, physical impairment, and mental anguish, among other claims.

The defendants filed a general denial and asserted multiple defenses, including comparative responsibility, contributory negligence by the plaintiff, and that any injuries were due to pre-existing conditions. The vehicle owner defendant specifically defended against the negligent entrustment claim, stating the vehicle was joint marital property, the driver possessed a valid license and clean driving record, and there was no evidence of incompetence. One defendant driver also claimed the incident was caused by the other defendant driver's failure to exercise reasonable care. The court granted a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of the vehicle owner defendant regarding the negligent entrustment claim.

Following mediation, the parties reached a settlement agreement. A Guardian Ad Litem was appointed to represent the minor plaintiff's interests in the settlement. On October 31, 2017, the court approved the compromise settlement, finding it to be in the best interest of the minor plaintiff. The court subsequently entered a consent judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, which included a $400 award for the minor plaintiff, held by the Clerk until the minor reached age 18. The minor plaintiff later applied to withdraw the funds.

VerdictlyTM Score

36
/100
Potentially Unfair

This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Deserve a fair outcome for your case?

Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On November 14, 2011, a rear-end collision occurred on the Katy Freeway in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff had stopped her vehicle in the left lane due to traffic when the defendant's vehicle struck it from behind. The plaintiff alleged the collision caused sprains and strains to her cervical and thoracic spine and left shoulder. The lawsuit claimed the defendant was negligent by traveling at an excessive speed, failing to maintain an assured clear distance, and failing to brake in a timely manner. Initially, the defendant argued the plaintiff made a sudden stop, which prevented avoidance. However, prior to trial, the defendant stipulated liability for the collision. The dispute then focused on the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, with the defendant maintaining that the plaintiff was not seriously injured and any alleged injuries were pre-existing. A jury found that the plaintiff did not suffer any serious or permanent injury in the collision.

Harris County • 2015
View full case
$9,020
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.

Harris County • 2015
View full case
$30,003
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On March 13, 2012, a plaintiff was injured in a multi-vehicle collision while driving in slow traffic near Highway 59 in Houston, Texas. The defendant driver reportedly swerved into the plaintiff's lane, striking a vehicle behind the plaintiff, which then collided with the rear of the plaintiff's slowing car. The plaintiff subsequently filed a vehicular negligence action. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, operating a vehicle unsafely, and failing to apply brakes in a timely manner, which led to injuries including to the chest, neck, back, and a partial to full thickness tear of the right rotator cuff. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury. Following the proceedings, the court found the defendant negligent and that this negligence caused harm to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $10,000 for past pain and suffering, $10,000 for past disfigurement, and $10,003 for past medical expenses, totaling $30,003.

Harris County • 2015
View full case
$7,100
Settlement
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Economic Injury

On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.

Dallas County • 2015
View full case
$563,003
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.

Nueces County • 2015
View full case