Harris County Judge Awards Clear Title in Mechanic's Lien Dispute
One party entered into a contract for a vehicle and then defaulted on payments. The other party located the vehicle for repairs and refused to return it, demanding payment. The first party sought possession of the vehicle and clear title. The repair shop defended their right to retain the vehicle. After a trial, the court awarded possession to the first party but also awarded damages to the repair shop for services rendered. The first party's motion for a new trial was granted, vacating the award to the repair shop.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $20,005
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2025
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
In Harris County, Texas, an auto financing company filed a lawsuit against an auto repair shop concerning the possession of a 2008 Mercedes Benz E Class. The plaintiff, a financing entity, had entered into a retail installment contract for the vehicle with an individual who subsequently defaulted on payments, leaving an unpaid balance of $26,789.39. The plaintiff located the vehicle at the defendant's repair shop, where the individual had reportedly sent it for repairs. The defendant refused to surrender the vehicle, demanding $6,300 for services and asserting a mechanic's lien.
The plaintiff filed the lawsuit seeking a writ of sequestration for the vehicle, clear title and possession, and a declaratory judgment recognizing its superior title certificate. The plaintiff argued the defendant's mechanic's lien notice was deficient, lacking a required tax identification number, and that the defendant refused to produce requested work orders. The defendant countered by asserting a valid mechanic's lien under Texas Property Code Section 70.001, claiming proper notification and the right to retain possession for services rendered, supported by an affidavit.
The court granted the plaintiff's application for a writ of sequestration, requiring a $7,250 bond. After an inadvertent non-suit and subsequent reinstatement, the case proceeded to a bench trial. On December 21, 2023, the court awarded the plaintiff clear title and possession of the vehicle. However, the court also initially ruled in favor of the defendant on a Quantum Meruit claim, awarding $6,330.73 in actual damages, $474.66 in prejudgment interest, and $6,600.00 in attorney's fees, totaling $13,405.39. This monetary judgment for the defendant was later vacated on March 1, 2024, when the court granted the plaintiff's motion for a new trial.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A case was filed in Texas by the plaintiffs against an individual defendant and defendant Rockwell Collins, Inc. Few details were available regarding the incident that led to the lawsuit or the specific legal claims asserted. The record indicated the case concluded on June 12, 2015. No further information was provided regarding the arguments of each side, the outcome, or the reasons for the verdict or judgment.
In October 2011, a plaintiff was driving a compact car eastbound on Interstate 10 in Harris County, Texas. While moving to the outside shoulder to yield to an approaching fire truck, the plaintiff's vehicle struck a rectangular hole in the pavement, causing a right front tire blowout. The hole, approximately two feet long and several inches deep, had resulted from the removal of a traffic-counting device and had not been refilled. The plaintiff alleged a shoulder injury. The plaintiff filed a premises liability lawsuit against the Texas Department of Transportation, alleging the hole constituted an unreasonably dangerous "special defect" that the agency knew or should have known about. The court ruled that the hole was a special defect as a matter of law. The defendant denied knowledge of the condition and contended that the plaintiff was negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff claimed the incident aggravated a pre-existing partial rotator cuff tear, while the defense argued the injury was entirely pre-existing and noted a six-month gap in the plaintiff's treatment history. After a two-day trial, a jury found the Texas Department of Transportation negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,973. The jury's finding of negligence was based on the determination that the defendant "knew or should have known" of the dangerous condition. The jury did not find the defendant negligent based on "actual knowledge," nor did it find the plaintiff comparatively negligent. The award included damages for past medical costs, past physical impairment, past lost earning capacity, and past physical pain.
A plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit in Dallas County, Texas, alleging that on April 2, 2012, a defendant negligently operated a vehicle. The plaintiff claimed the defendant failed to yield while making a turn, causing a collision with the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged injuries from the incident. The lawsuit was filed on April 1, 2014, in the District Court, 14th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. The parties later reached a settlement agreement on June 26, 2015. Under the terms, the plaintiff accepted $7,000 in full settlement of all claims. On July 9, 2015, the court entered an agreed order dismissing the case with prejudice based on the parties' joint motion.
A plaintiff filed a vehicular negligence action after his stopped vehicle was struck from the rear by a defendant's vehicle on April 10, 2014, at an intersection in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control the vehicle, maintain a proper lookout, and take evasive action. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained an ankle sprain and discogenic injuries to the cervical and lumbar spine as a result of the collision. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence, including that the plaintiff sustained serious or permanent injuries from the accident. A jury ultimately found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $16,361 for past damages and an additional $10,000 for future damages.
On March 13, 2012, a plaintiff was injured in a multi-vehicle collision while driving in slow traffic near Highway 59 in Houston, Texas. The defendant driver reportedly swerved into the plaintiff's lane, striking a vehicle behind the plaintiff, which then collided with the rear of the plaintiff's slowing car. The plaintiff subsequently filed a vehicular negligence action. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, operating a vehicle unsafely, and failing to apply brakes in a timely manner, which led to injuries including to the chest, neck, back, and a partial to full thickness tear of the right rotator cuff. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury. Following the proceedings, the court found the defendant negligent and that this negligence caused harm to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $10,000 for past pain and suffering, $10,000 for past disfigurement, and $10,003 for past medical expenses, totaling $30,003.