Harris County Judge Awards $13,556.98 in Rear-End Collision
A car rear-ended another vehicle on a highway in Harris County, Texas. The driver who was hit had their vehicle significantly damaged. The insurer of the damaged vehicle paid for the loss and then sued the driver who caused the accident. The defendant driver claimed medical issues prevented them from driving. The court ruled in favor of the insurer, awarding them the amount paid for the vehicle damage.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $13,556
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A motor vehicle collision occurred on December 7, 2019, on US 290 in Harris County, Texas, when the defendant failed to control speed and struck the rear of a 2019 Tesla Model 3. The incident resulted in significant damage to the vehicle. The insurer for the vehicle owner compensated the insured party $13,556.98 for the loss, subsequently becoming subrogated to that amount.
The insurer filed a complaint against the defendant on January 19, 2021, seeking to recover the $13,556.98 in damages, along with prejudgment interest, court costs, and attorney's fees. The plaintiff supported its claim with a business records affidavit documenting property damage and payments made to a collision center, a rental car company, and the insured party. The defendant acknowledged involvement in the accident but stated that an issue with her insurance, including a cancellation she learned of later, and medical issues, including recent eye surgery, affected her ability to drive and read.
On February 23, 2022, the court rendered a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment awarded $13,556.98 in damages, prejudgment interest, and court costs, with additional interest at a rate of 5.00% per year. No appeal was filed in the case.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.