Grand Prairie Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Left-Turn Crash
One driver was traveling on a street when another driver turned left from a different lane, striking the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to his back, head, and neck. The second driver admitted fault but stated he was unfamiliar with the street and did not realize it was a one-way street. The defense argued the second driver made an honest mistake and was not negligent.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
On December 29, 2014, a collision occurred in Grand Prairie, Texas, when a driver in the left lane of East Jefferson Street was struck by a vehicle making a left turn from the right lane. The plaintiff, a pool plumber's assistant, claimed he sustained injuries to his back, head, and neck, including cervical and lumbar sprains and strains, and ultimately alleged L4-5 and L5-S1 intervertebral disc protrusions causing radiating pain. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent in the operation of his vehicle.
The defendant acknowledged being at fault for the collision but contended he was unfamiliar with the street, believed it was a one-way street, and did not realize the left lane was not an oncoming lane due to a lack of signage. The defendant argued he made an honest mistake and was not negligent. The plaintiff underwent chiropractic treatment, physical therapy, and received lumbar trigger point and facet injections. A pain management doctor later recommended a lumbar rhizotomy.
Defense counsel argued that any injuries resolved with the initial physical therapy, pointing to records indicating low pain levels and normal ranges of motion after the final session. The defense also questioned the documentation of radicular pain and causation, noting the plaintiff was involved in a subsequent hit-and-run accident on November 26, 2015, after which he again claimed lower back injuries and sought treatment from the same chiropractor. The defense also highlighted the pain management doctor's acknowledgment under cross-examination that most of his patients were accident-related and that he had been reprimanded by the Texas Board of Medical Examiners for poor record-keeping related to radiculopathy. After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for 35 hours before rendering a defense verdict, finding the defendant was not liable for the accident.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.