Grand Prairie Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $26,500 in Motorcycle Crash
One driver was motorcycling east when another driver attempted a left turn into an apartment complex. The motorcyclist struck the car and was thrown onto the pavement. The driver who turned was cited for failure to yield the right of way. The motorcyclist claimed multiple injuries, including knee contusions, ankle sprain, hand abrasions, lumbar disc bulge, hip pain, neck pain, shoulder pain, and anxiety.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $26,500
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Hip Injury
- Accident Type
- Motorcycle
- Case Type
- Hip, Anxiety, Chiropractic
Case Overview
On September 3, 2015, a collision occurred on West Tarrant Road in Grand Prairie, Texas. A deliveryman, operating a motorcycle, was traveling east in the left lane when a driver, heading west, attempted a left turn into an apartment complex. The motorcyclist struck the car's right rear quarter panel and was thrown onto the pavement. The driver received a ticket for failure to yield the right of way.
The motorcyclist subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver, alleging negligence for making an unsafe left turn, failing to yield the right of way, and failing to maintain a proper lookout. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries, including knee contusions, an ankle sprain, hand abrasions, a lumbar disc bulge, and ongoing pain in the hip, neck, and shoulder, along with anxiety. The plaintiff underwent various treatments, including emergency room visits, chiropractic care, physical therapy, and steroid injections, and claimed lost work time and persistent pain. The investigating officer testified that the defendant failed to yield.
The defendant testified that she stopped and looked for oncoming traffic before initiating her turn and denied negligence, asserting she acted as a reasonably prudent driver. While the defense did not dispute the reasonableness of the plaintiff's medical bills, it contested the amount sought for non-economic damages. The defense highlighted that the plaintiff ceased treatment seven weeks post-accident and that chiropractic records indicated decreasing pain and full range of motion at the last evaluation.
After a one-day trial, the jury found the defendant negligent. The jury, in a 10-2 verdict, awarded the plaintiff $26,500 in damages. The two dissenting jurors had voted against finding liability.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.